Astonishingly, the private keys were 4, 56, 66, 115, 155, 156, 230, 237.
exploiting compromised certificates requires an active adversary-in-the-middle attack, meaning the attacker must act as a proxy between two TLS parties and receive encrypted traffic, decrypt it, reencrypt it, and send it to the other party. Such capabilities, in some cases, are usually limited to only the most well-resourced attackers. People with control of a local network—at a coffee shop, university, or other organization—face much less of a challenge.
https://emudhra.we-have-a-problem.com/
What? Which dumbass wrote this? A 10yo skiddie can do this with a simple enforced proxy on an open WiFi AP.
I could literally grab a travel router, use the already installed OpenWrt on it, and deploy a sniffer that proxies all traffic, and for any traffic using the specific keys that leaked... unpack and repack those requests and responses on the fly.
I love how they're trying to downplay this.
—https://emudhra.com/en/post/certificate-security-incident
so no, there is no “traffic using the specific keys that leaked” and hence your attack wouldn’t yield anything, but one could use these certificates to reencrypt and impersonate
i’ll also note that you excluded the last sentence of the paragraph you quoted, which makes clear that “some cases” refers to cases other than the case at hand