this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
550 points (95.4% liked)

Climate

9076 readers
77 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's not really how it reads? The end of the comment is the definition of apathy. "Oh my vote doesn't matter"....

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Just because someone is accurately describing the effectiveness of a single vote does not mean they are saying you shouldn’t do it. It’s supposed to be a call to action. Like, if you really care about political outcomes, voting should be the least thing you do.

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it accurately describes a single vote. That's like looking at a large data set and only showing a single data point. The point is that there are A LOT of votes.

It doesn't read like a call to action to me at all... Reads like a doomer post, which is what comment OP says they're mocking but it definitely doesn't read that way.

Either way, I'm in agreement with both of you, but I disagree with the approach. I believe it's the opposite of the stated intent.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Personally, I think it's more doomer to insist that everyone beat their heads against the wall doing the same one thing that has been proven to not work than to say, "hey, this isn't working, we should try something else."

[–] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Totally, I don't insist on beating any heads against any walls.

But simultaneously, I am against apathy posts.