this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2026
1330 points (97.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

12422 readers
2852 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
1330
Praxis (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theolodis@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The issue is that even if you voted for the democrat every time, due to them not improving the living situation considerably you'll always end up having the worse guy win at some point.

The only thing that would really help would be to finally start improving the living reality of the people.

[–] epicstove@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's why we need people to vote in the primaries.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wilding v. DNC is the court case where the DNC admitted that they don't have to abide by the primaries because they are a private entity and can nominate whomever they want.

They admitted this in open court because so many people voted in the primaries for Bernie, and yet they nominated Hillary, that they could no longer hide this fact from the majority of the Democrat voting public.

The truth was short lived though, as that case is almost completely memory holed, and everyone pretends like none of that happened a decade ago.

I was there. I remember. Sure, vote in the primaries and vote for the "lesser evil", but we won't win anything without infiltrating the Democrat bureaucracy and forming unions and serious protests.

[–] NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The primaries that they can decide not to have? Or that the winner didn't really win?

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

at least one state had open primaries, I'd need to check if others do but we got ours from a ballot measure.

[–] NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow, how generous of them to give one state a primary, maybe.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

according to balotopedia it's 14 with open primaries

[–] NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Truly the land of democracy, lol.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nah, if people cared about politics before Election Day we could be pushing for better candates in the primaries.

We absolutely will continue to get the choice between a shit sandwich and a shit burrito every time if we keep refusing to take part in the ingredient selection.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm gonna need to stop you right there.

Pushing for better candidates means defining a coherent set of qualities one wants in a candidate and then actually doing legwork for them instead of flinging shit everywhere from the lazy safety of your bedroom in your parents' house.

[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You're supposed to "improve living reality" before and after voting, not instead of... Voting doesn't preclude protesting or working to that end.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Last time the democrats had control of all three branches of government, americans got slightly better healthcare, and now insurance companies can't just refuse to cover conditions they claim you had before you got insurance. Also no more lifetime maximums.

[–] NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also thousands of innocent civilians were murdered on the other side of the planet by those democrats, but they were brown so they didn't count?

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True, but do democrats improve more than the previous republican made it worse? It doesn't feel like it.

Also I wouldn't use Healthcare as an example of something that works in the US

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

No, because it's easier to destroy than to build.

Also Republicans have had complete control of government more than Democrats over the last few decades, so you'd expect Republican policy to be moved further.