this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
412 points (98.8% liked)

Flippanarchy

2861 readers
672 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.


Banner by @Val@anarchist.nexus

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We just watched a guy become a trillionaire and dump 200 million dollars into an election for the most powerful seat on the planet. But you don't think the problem is capitalism????

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Citizens United would be my first target. Campaign finance laws in general coming next. A big root cause lies in ownership of "the free press," that one will be trickier, where does "news" stop and "entertainment" begin - and how would you ever regulate politics out of "entertainment" without impacting free speech? But, it's important to address if you want to really reduce money's influence in politics. Unfortunately, our legislators have been running the opposite direction for decades and the ballot box seems ineffective at convincing them to turn around.

Targeting capitalism, or communism, or pastafarianism, is pointless - they're big fuzzy clouds that you can't define, can't contain.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 47 minutes ago

The first 30 seconds are going down a very sensible path. It's not our figureheads which "rule us" - it's the people who put them in power. In theory it's a democracy, in practice it's a mish-mash where the opinions of the masses can be, and are, manipulated by those with the resources and inclination to do so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leave_the_World_Behind_(film) hit pretty close to my perception of "how it works" in their little monologue about "who makes the decisions."

[–] NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You're confusing religion with economic systems of government.

Capitalism and communism very much have definitions. Don't let your governments obfuscation of words cloud your mind.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 0 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

Capitalism and communism very much have definitions, which are not actually practiced in anything resembling "pure form" anywhere on this planet in any society of more than a couple of thousand members in human history.

You might as well call our economic system a religion, like Pastafarianism, because what it actually is is a byzantine collection of laws and rules and regulations which have about as much to do with the "ideals" of either captialism or communism as your average US "Christian" Megachurch has to with the written teachings of Jesus.

[–] NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml 0 points 39 minutes ago