1443
As a reminder...
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
1443 points (85.3% liked)
Political Memes
5406 readers
2507 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yesterday I thought this was a fair but controversial message to post after the massacre, but then today the deathtoll more than doubled and Israel is demolishing massive buildings. I feel like maybe they've skipped a few steps in their crusade for "retribution." It's not controversial at all anymore, that escalated fucking quickly.
What are they supposed to do when Hamas makes its bases in civilian buildings? Once they do that, it's no longer a civilian building, it's a valid strategic target.
Where do you suggest they 'make a base'? Gaza is the densest populated place on earth, it's a prison colony. It's not like there's land separate from residential areas available in Gaza that Hamas doesn't want to use, any plot possible to build on has already been built on.
They wouldn't need a base if they weren't running a terrorist operation would they?
Reread your own comment genius.You said it was legitimate to target civilian areas because Hamas 'made its base' among civilians. Even accepting your premise that Hamas is running a terrorist operation, it's still a war crime to bomb civilian targets the way Israel does.
Just had a quick look at Article 52 of the Geneva Convention, and from what I can see as long as the intel is solid regarding military use of a building, then it's a legitimate target. It's only dodgy if you aren't sure of the use.
Interesting for an Israel supporter to raise international law. You know that occupation and annexation, forced removal of the local population and replacing them with your own population are all prohibited under international law right? And that the occupied population has the right to resist by any means, including violence? So why would you call Palestinian resistance to occupation terrorism then? It's very much legitimate use of violence then, under international law.