96
Sexually transmitted diarrhea cases soaring in US — and its growing resistant to medicine
(www.independent.co.uk)
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
thats not the only way it spread. fecal matter on the hands of someone preparing food can. which is much more scary. fecal matter on hands is unfortunately a not uncommon thing. I was so happy during covid when so many restaurants started getting and mandating the light plastic gloves. wash hands signs are just not adequate.
Yes you are right, but the sexual transmission aspect has reasons to mention it. One thing I'm unclear about is how frequently this disease spreads sexually vs by other means, I couldn't find this mentioned in the article and if the study mentioned it I can't parse the academic jargon well enough to see it.
my problem is calling it an std, because it will run rampant with out any sexual activity happening in a community. A monestary could have an outbreak. To me it minimizes it by looking at one way it can transmit when its likely not even the most common. Food borne pathogens are a much bigger deal.
I guess that's fair, but the wording of the title to me doesn't imply that it can't spread other ways. I wish we did know whether it's the most common though because that is very relevant to whether the headline is misleading.
there is no way sexual contact is more common with this type of pathogen than someone preparing food without washing their hands. that is such a common spread vector I just can't possibly see it.
In one of the studies cited by this one it's implied that the number is around 30% (in Australia):
And 60% for the specific strain associated with sexual transmission and higher antibiotic resistance:
Although I'm also reading that it differs a lot by region because of different hygiene/public health standards so the numbers might be different elsewhere.
yeah this is a small sample size for a disease that has been around a long time. When it comes down to it I feel it wierd to call it sexual transmitted. Any disease that can be transmitted by any bodily secretion or inhalation for that matter can be transmitted with sexual contact. sexual contact is a very specific and not common circumstance. as much as std's are scary they are a subset that is kinda easy to avoid but also sucks to avoid.