this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
1316 points (96.9% liked)

Work Reform

17772 readers
1557 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But the usual rational response is, if what they earn is never enough for the blind pursuit of more, than they will always, "make less" in their minds and justify abuse of their positions.

This city needs an enema...

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you set the congressional pay at a high level, and ban all other sources of income. Any securities must be placed in a blind trust for the duration of service.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

"High level" is the problem. It's a subjective number. You're going in wrong direction. Make it an objectively low number, maybe average full time salary in their state with potential to hit performance bonuses based on a number of measurable things that help their constituents.

Their pay needs to be linked to their performance in office and yes, a separate matter, but there needs to be tight regulation (and oversight with enforcement) for monitoring their wealth before, during and for a period after serving in office.