this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
538 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

88677 readers
3519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Well they'd certainly own less, that's for sure. Corporate profits would've gone down

There is no way you could say this with certainty. Why would corp profits go down... I could as easily say they'd go up (people have more money because their wages are keeping up so they spend more blah blah. Your taking at least 40 years and suggesting you could predict what would happen if they were fundamentally different.

Once an apple has been grown and harvested, only one person can eat it. Once a house is built, only one family can live in it at a time

Sure, but we don't have a lack of food problem, or a lack of housing problem. We have distribution problems. It doesn't take one person to farm all day to feed a family anymore, we can feed thousands with one persons labour now. We have the houses, the ownership is concentrated.

The whole retirement thing is predicated on growth

Right, we don't have 0.01% holding 10% of total wealth, we couldn't possibly be spreading that out more evenly. We don't ask children to go down to the mine, we put them in school. We work together to make more than we need and those growing up and those in old age reap either the benefits of learning and practising, or having earned it through their lifes work resting.

It baffles my mind that you ignore the work retired people did before they retired.

Which is why I keep telling people: If you don't want retirement ages to rise, you better be making babies and tons of them

You should stop telling them that.