this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
103 points (97.2% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3072 readers
390 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Trump has inadvertently been one of the best proponents of EVs.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It'd be hilarious (annoying, but hilarious) if he gets remembered in history for that reason.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Seems more likely that it's Elon who get credited with that.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Musk barely hit 7% market share, it was gas prices that increased EV sales.

Also, Musk did not start, nor was a founder of Tesla, that's another lie he propagates.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Idk. Elon had a hand in popularising EVs before he went nuts, but Trump's the one who destabilised the world fuel markets.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

But this assumes that the higher fuel prices are the main driver for the switch and I personally don't think this is the case.

Why Tesla took off was not because it was electric - we've had electric cars before. The real reason was that it's actually a good car and a viable alternative to an internal combustion one. People weren't just buying them to save the environment or save on the fuel costs. They were choosing the superior product.

Nowadays this is the case with pretty much all EVs. It's not a gimmick anymore but you can actually daily drive one and it's in many ways superior to the internal combustion alternatives. If they were still slow, small, ugly and with a low range I don't think the cheaper cost of "refueling" would matter.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But this assumes that the higher fuel prices are the main driver for the switch and I personally don't think this is the case.

I mean, that's the thrust of the whole article. Not just price, but stability and energy independence for govts.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The article says that high-gas prices is what pushed the sales below 50% - not that high fuel prices are the main driver of EV adoption.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm literally not seeing the difference between the two statements.

[–] Fallibilist@feddit.uk 3 points 8 hours ago

The straw that breaks the camel's back isn't any heavier than the pile of straw already loaded on it.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

hes also hurting also rotting his own party from the inside out too. i give him credit for that.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 hours ago

I’ll believe that when the party dies. Until then I’m skeptical.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And who stopped oil from getting unnecessarily shipped around the world? Him too! That guy with oatmeal brains single-headedly demolished a global constitution. And he's working hard on dismantling the most polluting of all industries... Personal computing! That boat is gone.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Trump just proven gas was too cheap to influence environmental policy. Nobody GAF about global climate change to buy EVs, it was all the price of gas.