this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2026
1386 points (97.5% liked)

Comic Strips

25739 readers
2194 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links
Other Comic Communities of Interest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 21 points 6 days ago (4 children)

AR has so many unsolvable privacy issues it's wild ..

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Honestly I don't need a camera or anything integrated but I'd love to have an integrated screen for my glasses. Would be nice when putting things together to just sync it with my phone and just have it there, also maps. Look I have to wear glasses all the time might as well add a tiny bit more utility.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But are they intigratable in pre existing glasses? My prescription is non negotiable due to how bad my eyesight is without and I can't do contacts. Also having them sync with my phone and having them do little to no processing would be my preferred method, rather than having them contain all the computational shit themselves.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, they use a second set of prescription lenses for corrective lenses. They plug directly into your device via USB-C.

Ew USB C wired connection no thanks. This would legit be a hard non starter for me, in my experience USB C wears out relatively fast and tends to fuck up on the data connection side even if the charging still works. Honestly with this type of thing I'll probably wait until I can just build my own thing, between proprietary bullshit and my own preferences it'd probably be better and piss me off less.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

GPS with accelerometers should be able to work out where you're standing and where you're facing, so you could have navigation with a floating marker over the turn you need to take instead of just having a mini-map, too.

Maybe but I'd personally prefer the mini-map, I've a built up hatred of floating way points.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Kinda depends on the definition on that one, personally I would consider a IRL HUD to be a low level version of that since it would be intigraing those systems in a pretty intimate way.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's solvable if you take surveillance capitalism out of the equation, just as Valve are doing. AR with Meta behind it will never be something that is socially acceptable since their whole business model is selling out the user and everyone around them. With a company like Valve which has a pretty good track record regarding privacy (a.k.a the only things transferred regarding usage are what games you play to make store recommendations fit your taste and bug reports if you approve them) i can see a wider adoption taking place.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that's true, your personal privacy as the owner of the device is one thing, everyone else's right to not be continuously photographed is another. Having Valve operate it over meta doesn't solve that. Also, what happens when Gabe does and the investment bank that buys it decides they want to sell everyone data to maximise profit?

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

These things can be done in a privacy respecting way for other parties too. The computational power needed to realize a person is in the field of view and to process this person saying "i consent" is in everyones pocket nowadays.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think if you can plan for somehow allowing concent for these things then you can also plan for bypassing it. Also it would need to film you to work out if you don't consent and then it's already breached the consent.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between passively waiting for a voice command by a person identified in RAM and storing these things. And sure, there will always be people breaking the rules, but if you actually try to make the product secure, the vast amount of people will NOT be fucking around with that.

Take Metas PervGlasses for example: There's a LED that shows it is recording. You can remove that light with a simple dremel, and no one at Meta even thought about implementing a simple check like making the LED flash a OTP code to be recognized by the camera at the start of recording. It makes a whole lot of difference who is developing these things, trust me.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think the problem is that shit manufacturers exist, so how do you regulate that. At this point you can only assume all AR glasses are sending everything they record to their manufacturer for on selling to the ir favourite data broker, because that's literally the market. There severely limited options for ethical devices and those that do exist could be bought next week and their policies change on a dime.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We regulate that with laws with teeth. I know, that is a foreign concept for most of the US, but even there with California and lately NY there are areas who have started to hold corporations accountable (even if it is on a small scale yet). The GDPR is already basically making Metas glasses illegal in their current form, and they are currently involved into a record amount of lawsuits.

There is still a lot of work to do, but the basics have been prepared.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah that's fair. I'm in Australia so we get some of the benefits of European policy, but mostly we are slaves to whatever the US and China want to throw at us. Honestly I'm less concerned about China and more concerned about the attitudes of US corporations at this point. They've demonstrated time and time again that they will stop at nothing to make a line go up in the short term.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We've mostly been looking in to how it can be utilized in a production environment with detailed machine stats at a glance, live setpoints without having to be near the control panel, aids for maintenance...that sort of things

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago

That could be helpful, I think most tech and inlecs would find it more annoying than anything ..

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The meta display glasses would be cool if not for the whole meta part. You don't even need to be able to access the camera. It should just be used for tracking.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's not really AR then is it, AR requires the overlay on reality, I guess it could be like a game OSD but a lot of that detail is probably more annoying than anything. A live map might be good sometimes, but do I need my heart rate showing all the time in regular day to day life? is it helpful to have a shopping list taking up space in my vision all the time? How do I interact with it if it can't see my hands, do I then have to talk to it constantly to manipulate it? Can other people manipulate my OSD while I'm using it by saying the right thing? Seems pretty gimmicky ..

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, not what I meant. I meant environment tracking, hand tracking, everything.

WE don't need access to the camera for AR to work, the device just needs to be able to process the video stream.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The problem isnt your privacy, it's everyone else's. If there are glasses with cameras then some arsehole is running around photographing people without their permission. You might argue that if you're out in public then you can be photographed but that's a shit attitude, if someone is walking around photographing people they should at least have to make it obvious so people can have a say at the time or at least know about it before it turns out they are now an AI deepfake pornstar.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's why you block user access to the camera.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah because hacking devices isn't a thing or anything ..

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

at least in the US you don't need permission to record people in public spaces.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Legal doesn't mean right. There are a whole host of situations where you shouldn't be filming and if someone is filming you want them to be obvious about it. Schools, playgrounds, change rooms etc.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

schools and changing rooms are already somewhat because they aren't considered public, playgrounds are insanely public and have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

I think there's an expectation that you can identify when someone is filming in playground. I'd be very fucking curious as to what someone thought they were doing if they were walking around filming my kids in a playground. If they are wearing AR glasses then there a reasonable assumption they are filming constantly and sending that data to whoever made the glasses.