this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
156 points (96.4% liked)

politics

31307 readers
2146 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They turned out not to be the lapdogs he’d hoped for.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6123220-supreme-court-votes-against-trump/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

“They voted against me too often,” the president continued. “I gave them the position of a lifetime, and they vote against me often. They vote for me too.”

...

“So they have loyalty to Barack Hussein Obama. They have loyalty to Biden, even though Biden doesn’t even know who the hell they are. He wouldn’t know. He doesn’t even know what the Supreme Court is. And me, I gave them the chance of a lifetime, and it’s unfortunate what they did,” he said.

puddingbrain.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (3 children)

LOL, he always goes back to his personal grievances. He hates that Obama was voted in. Him and so many other conservatives lost their fucking minds over Obama being in office. Not just one term, but two terms. He also cannot stand it that Obama and Seth mocked him at that White House Correspondents Dinner. Utterly humiliated him. He is still has raging butthurt over all of it.

Also, Obama was approved by so many more, had a much bigger and girthier crowd size, AND got a Nobel Peace Prize.

He also hates that he lost to Biden. He just cannot take it.

Surprised he didn't throw Rosie O'Donnell into the mix, too.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If I was on the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, I'd push to give the next Nobel Peace Prize to Obama again.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Same. Just to make sure that Obama has one more than even the 1 that donnie stole from that woman.

Also, JFC, can you even believe he kept it? That fact alone is just....staggering.

And I'm sure he's someone that thinks participation trophies are stupid, meanwhile, he has something worth way less than a participation trophy. He is just beyond stupid.

He really is a complete embarrassment to the country, in every single way.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's okay, his biggest records are yet to come: First president to go to go to prison, first president to get executed.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

First president to go to go to prison, first president to get executed.

Well, I'd much rather the first part. As for the second, I'm against the death penalty, but if the justice system felt that was truly the only way that conservatives would ever learn a fucking lesson here, then I would reluctantly agree with it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

That's why I strike a middle ground on the death penalty. I think it is used far too much, and often for all the wrong reasons, but OTOH, I also believe that some people have EARNED their death penalty, and who are we to begrudge them their earnings?

It should only be used at the Federal level, and should apply to only a handful of cases in an entire decade, across the entire country. It should be reserved for the most heinous crimes, like serial killers, child killers, torture killers, child molester killers, etc., as well as those who have committed high treason. Even then, it should be reserved for those whose cases have no doubts by anyone at all. And before the execution takes place after a reasonable cooling off period, the entire case is automatically reviewed by a panel of judges before being carried out.

I don't like the Death Penalty, either, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have a responsible place in our society.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Some needs are better served by free individuals acting alone in a field in Pennsylvania, instead of a bubmbling government operation

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 4 points 3 days ago

No doubt still pissed he lost the popular vote to Hilary, too.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 4 days ago

He literally does not understand that they're supposed to be independent and not just do whatever he says.