this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2026
580 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

12265 readers
1927 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I assume that people drop out as they get tired. Eventually, there's few enough people involved that it just no longer counts as an orgy. At that exact moment, some people are still going, but the orgy has ended.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I suppose now the question is what's the minimum number of people to classify it as an orgy. 5 is my best guess.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That sounds right. I've heard of a threesome. I've heard of a foursome. Never heard of a fivesome. Because that's when it becomes and orgy.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But what about if it’s a gangbang instead?

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So an orgy would need to have 5 people with either 3 genders or at least people of 2 genders.

[–] Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Noting the charge levied in another comment on this, I'd amend to 5 people with a minimum of two bottoms.

A group of 5 people with 4 tops and 1 bottom probably changes the classification to a gangbang. 1 top and 4 bottoms, a reverse gangbang (and likely tricky to pull off). 2 tops and 3 bottoms, or 3 tops and 2 bottoms, would seem to form the minimum unit to be classified as an orgy. However, further study is needed.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I think we have a scientific definition now

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 days ago

I'd prefer 5 separate genders at my origies, we have the technology

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah, cracks in the wall found an issue as well. His proposed minimums of 2 tops, 2 bottoms and 5 people is better.