this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
138 points (96.0% liked)

Star Wars

6323 readers
3 users here now

Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.

  1. Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.

  2. Posts must be on-topic.

  3. No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.

  4. No memes/low-effort spam/Youtube poops style posts. !starwarsmemes@lemmy.world is a place for those.

  5. Posts must be coherent.

  6. If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.

Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.

Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LemmyEntertainYou@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Is that a bad thing? The prequels are great. Far better than anything Disney have released.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

If you read all the extended universe stuff that existed to explain the clone wars you would understand how bad the sequels are to a starwars project.

It isn't any better than some of the tv failed projects like wheel of time, sword if truth, shannara, American gods.

It's absolutely hollow after learning about the star wars lore through those characters.

There are some great moments and people in the sequels. But as a whole they made star wars worse. Find and read the thrawn trilogy, or the rogue squadron books if you want a glimpse at what could have been.

Considering Lucas took a lot of interest and veto over what stories were allowed to be published so that the world fit his idea instead of corrupting it, you just can't see the prequels or sequels as anything but terrible.

[–] Duhtocqueville@ttrpg.network 1 points 5 days ago

I’m not sure I agree with the proposition that the prequels are far better than the Disney movies.

Phantom menace had some serious pacing and tone issues. The other two were better but I don’t j ow I’d say they are far better than Disney. They held to the cannon way more but that was its own weakness in the core plot which really kept them from being entirely interesting.

I will say the Disney movies are much better paced than the prequels. Well that’s not true that one slow space chase with the side quest on planets was a major drag. The first Disney movie was better paced than the prequels.