this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
-3 points (41.2% liked)
Programming
28684 readers
238 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Dude seems to be high on AI propaganda and is completely ignoring that running any model has some cost. Sure, right now many companies are burning through tokens like wildfire, but that won't last forever - it possibly won't even last thru 2027 - so calling any part using AI "free" is just dumb, even for people who run models locally.
He mentions how frontier models, the most expensive ones, are doing the best job. Guess what, those are the ones that aren't on huggingface and joe schmoe isn't going to pay up for.
I think the author gestures at a pretty solid argument that most of the "mechanical" arguments for LLM capabilities have a clear trend line towards "can do thing".
Strictly speaking, the job he's describing even falls into that category, there's just not a lot of training data for it.
Anecdotally this has matched what I've seen. Which is unfortunate because the part of tech I like the least, regarding software development, is when the thing that was built was actually used for anything.
I got into this specifically, and exclusively, for the craft. I don't like making other's lives " better", I don't like "solving problems", I don't like the customer. But here we are staring down the barrel of a career making "products".
This is a really great point. AI tokens are expensive for quality today, and that will continue. We're already seeing a bit of a plateau, and this whole "let's slow down so we don't kill ourselves" is propaganda, I think. AI companies that leverage "price to value" are going to succeed. I see Google Gemini fitting this mold long term, GLM, Kimi did fit this mold but their later models seem to jump in price pretty fast chasing Opus capability. If you take "capable models" as the standard for price to value and then charge what it actually costs (not VC subsidized), then you're going to see a world where Software Engineers are probably back in high demand. I think the article points out the hard part: how do you grow new Sr. Engineers if you're replacing Jr's with Claude. (I think the obvious answer is that we shouldn't be replacing Jr's with Claude)