this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
-3 points (41.2% liked)
Programming
28704 readers
511 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think the author gestures at a pretty solid argument that most of the "mechanical" arguments for LLM capabilities have a clear trend line towards "can do thing".
Strictly speaking, the job he's describing even falls into that category, there's just not a lot of training data for it.
Anecdotally this has matched what I've seen. Which is unfortunate because the part of tech I like the least, regarding software development, is when the thing that was built was actually used for anything.
I got into this specifically, and exclusively, for the craft. I don't like making other's lives " better", I don't like "solving problems", I don't like the customer. But here we are staring down the barrel of a career making "products".