this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
195 points (94.1% liked)
Just Post
1636 readers
124 users here now
Just post something ๐
Lemmy's general purpose discussion community with no specific topic.
Sitewide lemmy.world rules apply here.
Additionally, this is a no AI content community. We are here for human interaction, not AI slop! Posts or comments flagged as AI generated will be removed.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So winner takes all, essentially. So low testing schools, which are generally more poor fall even further behind. Wow.
Also, this reminds me of Goodhart's law.
Exactly
There were some strong criticisms of NCLB when it was first created that correctly predicted this would happen.
Another unintended consequence was the death of elective classes in all but the most affluent schools. Schools strapped for cash needed the extra money offered by NCLB so they diverted what little resources they had into classes that were measured through standardized testing. Shop, agriculture, civics, home economics, classes that actually helped students live a good life were axed in favor of more math and science since students generally performed lower in those subjects and were dragging scores, thereby funding, down