MajorasMaskForever

joined 2 years ago
[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let me ask you this

Take a CPU designed in the last 80 years. Ask it to divide integer 1 by integer 2. Explain to me why the CPU hands back 0 and not 0.5.

Technical solutions do have fundamental limitations to them that cannot be overcome. That scenario plays out all the time. We didn't overcome integer division by brute force, we acknowledged that the approach of having computers use integers for numbers is flawed and came up with a bunch of possible solutions until finally settling on IEEE754 and even then it still doesn't handle all math correctly.

Blindly saying such issues can be overcome is, imho, the truly stupid statement

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Technological impossibilities exist all the time. They're one of, if not the biggest, drivers behind engineering and design.

Realistically, computational power

The more number crunching units and more memory you throw at the problem, the easier it is and the more useful the final model is. The math and theoretical computer science behind LLMs has been known for decades, it's just that the resource investment required to make something even mediocre was too much for any business type to be willing to sign off on. Me and my fellow nerds had the technology and largely dismissed it as worthless or a set of pipe dreams

But then number crunching units and memory became cheap enough that a couple of investors were willing to take the risk and you get a model like ChatGPT1. Talks close enough like a human that it catches business types attention as a new revolutionary thing, and without the technical background to know they were getting lied to, the Venture Capitalism machine cranks out the shit show we have today.

Seems like this war is going to take longer than expected

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 is like this. Usually if someone spots you wanting to attack you, they'll yell or something similar to get others attention. But other times you'll have someone notice you, they'll walk over and alert their buddies first and then they all come after you

Order must be brought to chaos

The factory must grow

For pure entertainment or passive turn-brain-off type games I'm inclined to agree with you. Mario Party isn't exactly changing lives out here.

Games that tell a story though, they can be extremely impactful just like any form of story. Through stories I myself have changed my world views, taken new perspectives in life. Star Trek The Next Generation's season 6 episode Tapestry changed my outlook on risk taking especially in my professional life, my username reference to the Legend of Zelda Majora's Mask got me to overcome my extreme fear and anxiety of being rejected by friends. Was I much younger when I experienced those stories, sure, but they still changed the course of my life.

My day job is working on satellites, I'm a hobbyist carpenter, been teaching myself to play piano, frequently go camping/hiking into Colorado's mountains, work on a project car, and sure this evening I've been playing Factorio but I've been doing so while sipping wine that I made myself.

You could call me many things, but I don't think boring fits.

In short: sometimes nothing at all, sometimes self survival

In practice, when a state becomes a part of the United States it concedes total independence, giving itself to the jurisdiction and control of the federal government. In exchange, a state is given representation in the federal government to influence what laws make up that control and because after a few different rounds of early government structures post colonial independence, the federal government was kneecapped in terms of the types of laws it can pass. If a law passes Congress and survives a legal review by the federal courts, strictly speaking a state has no choice but to agree and cooperate. At best a state could work with other states to repeal laws a single state doesn't want/like.

The vast majority of the time states operate in relative good faith and follow federal law. When a state does openly defy the federal government, it depends on the exact law being ignored. Marijuana is illegal on the federal level where mere possession of it lands you in jail, but many states turn a blind eye to citizens using it and states like Colorado make bank off of taxing the sale of it. This kind of stuff happens a lot and the executive branch makes a judgement call on if it's politically worth punishing a state in defiance.

This current administration has proven repeatedly to be very vindictive and retaliates against even the perception of defying their rule. The last time a state continued defiance against the federal executive branch this nation threw itself into civil war and lost 2% of its population in the process.

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I think the limit depends on the exact item/market. Which is a nuance, and this is the Internet, nuance isn't allowed here.

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I can't tell for sure, but it looks like a Lenovo y510p. Or at least it looks very similar to the one I owned back in the day.

There was a vent in the hinge, and these things would absolutely cook themselves with the lid closed

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not about individual contributors using the right tools to get the job done. It's about needing fewer individual contributors in the first place.

If AI actually accomplishes what it's being sold as, a company can maintain or even increase its productivity with a fraction of its current spending on labor. Labor is one of the largest chunks of spending a company has so, if not the largest, so reducing that greatly reduces spending which means for same or higher company income, the net profit goes up and as always, the line must go up.

tl;dr Modern Capitalism is why they care

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What I was referencing by proxy war was Ukraine and what Israel was supposed to be. The US sends arms to another nation with the intention that the other nation, who is already in conflict (or just happens to be through dubious and convenient circumstances) will take those arms and give political adversaries a bloody nose or serve as enough of a distraction that they won't come after the US and keeps the US from putting boots on the ground. Is working out quite well for us in Ukraine, Israel was supposed to distract the middle east but turns out that when you hand a genocidal maniac a bunch of weapons, he's gonna do maniacal genocidal things with them. Who could have possibly guessed

view more: next ›