this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)

Quark's

2193 readers
12 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It may be that one won’t be reached at all.

The states may be dragging this out until after the November midterms to see if they may have more leverage in DC later.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like the news just broke - the terms can be found here.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 2 points 22 hours ago

Ooh, the states have gone for a number of conditions that will crystallize into requirements for divestments if Paramount fails to meet its expansive promises.

…Which the states likely believe will happen.

It’s a smart way for both sides to kick the problem downstream a bit until there’s a new administration.

It’s also a way for David Ellison to lock himself legally into doing things he personally wants to do (massive amounts of scripted production) while holding off his father and other investors.