this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2026
90 points (98.9% liked)

askchapo

23318 readers
119 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like they want these stories in the news to show "oh look how smart it is...sCaRy SMART, money please!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you read any of the details of the breaches its clear that OpenAI is being criminally negligent in their testing environments, but the breaches are real. And critically its not one super-agent doing the hacks but dozens or hundreds of agents acting as a swarm. Basically, OpenAI runs multiple test runs in parallel and has basically no human monitoring of what the agents are doing.

In the case of the huggingface hack, the agents establish communication with each other and started coordinating their attacks. This should've ended the test immediately but no one from OpenAI was watching. The logs from the test were so verbose that OpenAI resorted to using AI to summarize them meaning we can't fully trust their summary which fancifully describes the agents developing their own cult.

Ruby just reported that they were hacked back in May and OpenAI never disclosed it. That hack looks a lot like the AUR hack so now I'm suspecting them for that too.