this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
23322 readers
265 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
oh and will they succeed? Baltics are toast within a week, Poland will get a black eye but even with a comprehensive Russian mobilization Europe has a lot of bodies and a couple experienced units that can stall the advance before it gets too far. i mean assuming Europe jumps right in, any measure of hesitation and the Russians are fighting hollowed-out heaps of conscripts with days of ammo for weeks/months, who knows how far they'll punt em
There is a small part of me that knows that even EU countries are too paranoid about each other to commit too hard. After all, historically, every single time one of them ever fights Russia (barring WWII) they may fight Russia to a draw, but then end up getting their teeth kicked in by another European power.
That said, I don't think Russia has the morale or internal justification going on enough to make something like that palatable to the Russian populace, without a previous invasion. Even though Russia is an oligarchy, much like our oligarchy, it does require popular buy in to do this kind of stuff.
You never know, the EU leaders might be requesting aid from Poutine to deal with the riots after December price hikes.
This is the secret ending no one had foreseen.
Holy Alliance 2
France is the only serious military force in western europe. Germany in the "working on it" stage but I'm not sure how that's progressing. hopefully melenchon gets elected and averts ww3 for the time being!
fr, i'm not sure even the suicidally fascist germans would go full-tilt without France's nukes, soldiers, and functioning arms industry behind them. all power to melenchon, genocide illimité on le heap de penne and horizon/en marche
In total, all EU countries have about 2.5 million men under arms, which exceeds Russia‘s forces by about a million. And this is without any war time mobilisation or conscription. Add to that the Turkish military, which by virtue of multiple defence agreements would be aiding the European forces, and the Russian military is so far outmatched that there is no way in hell that the Russian Federation would ever dare strike anywhere west of Ukraine. The only “advantage” Russia has over a combined European army is a greater nuclear arsenal, but considering France has Overkill capacities, too, that particular point is moot. In a war of attrition, Europe, considering it has more than triple the population and contains economic powerhouses like Germany and France, would also be able to sustain such a campaign for far longer. And considering the slugfest the Ukraine war turned into, this scenario is more than likely, at least under the premise of war breaking out at all.
Russia has myriad short-term tactical advantages that could be parlayed into a war-plan:
-No peer experience in Eastern Europe
-Lack of materiel because it was sent to Ukraine and not replaced (an enormous heap of ammo, 'obsolete' vehicles, missiles, etc etc. was sent to Ukraine under the premise of "modernization" of NATO forces, but mere grains of replacements from the US, UK, FR and ROK have actually materialized)
-Distance of potent NATO forces (France, US)
And if there's any doubt and delay in entry of Europe at large--that 2.5 million under arms is just paper. Would Turkey actually move troops from around Syria and Kurdistan if it's not under attack? Will France abandon its toe-hold in Françafrique? Will/can the US perform the logistical task of moving and supplying those European troops? Sweden and Finland have impressive numbers but how are they getting stuck in? Crossing the Baltic? Invading Karelia?
I know it's terrifying to admit but there's a quite plausible case for a(n imagined) brief supporting thrust against NATO to force the collapse and capitulation of Ukraine, if (as I posited in the OP) Ukraine is only holding on due to NATO defending it.