this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)
Excellent Reads
3751 readers
22 users here now
Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.
Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.
Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.
Rules:
- Common Sense. Civility, etc.
- Server rules.
- Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.
Other comms that might be of interest:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Say that metal on a stick was made from a rare metal that can only be sourced by mining the land of a threatened indigeneous tribe. If I use or buy that tool am I really neutral, even if I build hospitals with it?
'I agree that nothing is neutral, but finding that ideological complication in a simple hammer doesn't make it more than a hammer.'
'Okay but what if I invent a hypothetical hammer that's even more ideologically complicated; is that neutral?'
Mu.
Anyway: there will come vegan models. There will be LLMs and diffusers trained entirely on public-domain and licensed data. They will have the exact same effect on users, for the same reasons that a tungsten conflict hammer still makes you think about misusing a screw. For better and for worse, it does the thing it's for. That's what tools are. Solving any ethical concerns with how they're made will not address this particular discussion.
Maybe more ethical choices will come. In the meantime we can reduce harm today and incentivise those building the hammers if we choose the ethical ones now.