this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
177 points (99.4% liked)
Climate
8969 readers
216 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I never said it contains math, I said it's based on bad math. Which it is. You're really not arguing in good faith, but I already knew you wouldn't.
And I already addressed the things you quoted, so who's ignoring second-halves of comments now?
You're jumping through a lot of hoops to try to defend a carnist argument which is wrong on a fundamental level.
Dude, look yourself in the mirror. Those "vegans on the internet" are mostly all tankie trolls just like you.
And I'm not even vegan. I'm just pointing out the flaws in GreenKnight's argument, because it's a flawed argument.
Oh but I am vegetarian, so I do know how easy it is to replace meat with veggies in ones diet, from a financial and logistical point of view. The hardest part is the emotional hurdle, the attachment to eating meat, the cravings. Which is no different from any other addiction.
If the argument was about those I would say "Yes, it's difficult to make the switch and I encourage people to do it slowly by gradually reducing their meat intake until they no longer miss it."
But that's not what the argument was about. They were trying to say it's cheaper and easier to buy meat at the store and cook it than it is to do with vegetables. Which is fundamentally incorrect.
Wordy+stupid+wrong
I tried to have an inteligent debate. But you desire to live in ignorance. Sad.
You really do have zero intelligent things to say, don't you...
You're bad at this
You continue to describe yourself. It's pathetic.