this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
61 points (98.4% liked)

Slop.

916 readers
512 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VILenin@hexbear.net
Hestia@hexbear.net
oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net
Diva@lemmy.ml
Diva@hexbear.net
mathemachristian@hexbear.net
kittenzrulz123@hexbear.net
61
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says AGI is already here β€” and the milestone is 'senseless' (mashable.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Monk3brain3@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So "AI" isn't actually artificial intelligence. Actually "AGI" is artificial intelligence. And we already have artificial intelligence. But who cares if "AGI" is artificial intelligence because it's a senseless milestone and it's not like the whole bubble is contingent on developing artificial intelligence πŸ˜‚

I just wonder what the next PR/branding term for "AI" that's is not artificial intelligence will be.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Renin@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's unclear exactly what Huang meant when saying Nvidia has already achieved AGI.

AI might be able to create a billion-dollar viral app but could not build a company like Nvidia. "The odds of 100,000 of those agents building Nvidia," he added, "is zero percent."

What does any of this even mean? What is that guy saying... okay-okay

[–] Riffraffintheroom@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

β€œThe workers who actually create things are replaceable but I am not.”

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Only my job is safe from being replaced by a glorified autocomplete" -Guy with one of the only jobs that could be replaced by glorified autocomplete.

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

To call what he does a 'job' is a stretch, even. His role is to be the disposable, humanoid face of the decisions of the investors. Better to call it a 'function'. It's a shame that even if he fails in his 'function' and is replaced, he'll still be more incomprehensibly wealthy than the collective lifetime net worth of every user on bearsite.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

It does sound kind of mindless but to those tech bros intelligence is about the ability to make money. Sam Altman has said stuff along that line quite a few times.