this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
422 points (98.6% liked)

memes

22492 readers
3066 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Coca, cacao.

Psilocybin isn't produced by plants but by fungi.

[–] Raccoon_Rick@altgag.net 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Correct, but fungi grow on organic substrates, therefore some of the nutrients required for their metabolism stem from plants. Also, no mention of DMT? I’m heavily disappointed in y’all!

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Oh yeah! My beloved DMT :) How could I forget

[–] DrStanleyGoodspeed@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

You’re right. Mushrooms aren’t plants. I stand corrected

[–] jama211@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Knowledge is knowing they're not a plant. Wisdom is still putting them in the plant section in the grocery store.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

There are at least two plant sections in the grocery store! And more if you consider that the shelves have plants as well.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Indeed they are not. They are their own category. Their cell structure is between plant cells and animal cells. A fungi cloud works similar to a brain. They are the things that make life possible. There are fungi living in our body which keeps us alive, we use them for bread, beer and penicillin among many other uses, they break down dead plants to create food for new plants, they divide food and communicate between trees, but they are themselves not plants. The largest living organism on earth is a fungi by the way.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

And then there are sponges.

They are plant animals, not animal plants. Most of them.

[–] DrStanleyGoodspeed@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I did not know that about the oldest living organism thing. where is this ancient fungi?

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 14 hours ago

Largest, not oldest. In Oregon, between 2500 and 8500 years old. But fungi existed before plants did, 1.3 billion and plants 700 million years ago. So fungi are much older.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Gone, but there used to be giant fungus "trees" called prototaxites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototaxites

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

there's actually new research saying prototaxites may not have been fungi, but belonged to an entirely separate kingdom that's now extinct. one of the defining characteristics of fungi are that their cell walls contain chitin, the same stuff that makes arthropod shells. prototaxites was found not to contain any chitin, while other ancient fungi of the same age as prototaxites already did, so it's not a feature of fungi that was adapted later. prototaxites was also found to contain microscopic structures that don't exist in any known fungus species

edit: damn, someone beat me to it while I was trying to find the details

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world -5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah... be sure to read the replies first next time

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

the other reply didn't exist yet when I started writing mine. sorry that I took longer because I tried to provide more detail about the thing you seemed interested in

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

From your link.

In 2026, research comparing fossils of a prototaxite species with other eukaryotic fossils in the same location found it to be structurally and chemically distinct, suggesting that Prototaxites is not a fungus and instead belongs to an extinct, previously undescribed kingdom of eukaryotic life.[1]

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12822639/

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Heh... learn something new every day

Edit: it sounds like it's a hot topic

It is widely considered a fungus, but the debate is ongoing.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

From the paper I linked, it's really interesting. They think it might be a giant eukaryote previously undefined.

We hypothesized that if P. taiti was a fungus, fossilization products resulting from the selective preservation or diagenetic alteration of glucan sugars would be present, derived from the original main composition of the cell walls including chitin (a polymer of N-acetyl glucosamine), or resulting from the recombination of glucan and protein into new melanoidin-like compounds, like those found in Fungi and arthropods in the Rhynie chert (39). To test this hypothesis, the previously assembled dataset of 47 samples, representing six higher taxonomic groups (39), was combined with 55 additional samples from these six groups and P. taiti (see the Supplementary Materials for full spectra for each sample, images of all sample spots, and details of taxonomic assignment). We then developed a novel analytic pipeline comprising two key steps: data exploration (step 1) and modelling (step 2) (fig. S3 and Supplementary Text Extended Methods). Step 1 aimed to show that biologically informative spectral bands correlated with taxonomic classification of specimens and that molecular fingerprints of organisms in the Rhynie chert retained information regarding their biological affinities, and to select the most relevant spectral features for further modelling. In step 2, we built classification models using supervised machine learning approaches to provide a robust statistical framework to accept or reject the taxonomic classification of each sample based on the selected spectral features.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Cool. I'll have to go back and read that tomorrow.