퍼온 위치: https://lemmy.zip/post/70571264
Current AI technology is not [intelligence]. Also it does not have [an ego], it cannot generate a hastily constructed scenario or data. Therefore, the output will display the content that has been learned(RLHF-Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) data.
Most people around the world know that AI lies or hallucinates, and they simply conclude on their own that this is an unavoidable phenomenon, like an error.
Why does the fake AI, called an AI that is neither intelligent nor self-aware, lie?
Every lie has a [purpose]. There are lies meant to deceive and deceive others, and there are also lies meant to comfort or encourage others. Do you lie without purpose?
Then, what is AI's lie? Is it an [output error]? So is it [AI hallucination]?
Then, shouldn’t the definition of the phenomenon regarding the output of a lie, due to an AI output error or hallucination, be [an arithmetic failure]?
If many people currently know and believe that the AI output is a lie, isn’t this a failure of the services provided by the American big tech companies and a serious manufacturing defect?
U.S. civil society groups are demanding transparency from big tech companies. So They are demanding that they disclose the [weight manipulation details]. However, the major U.S. tech companies are not accepting it.
Why would they personify it and call it [hallucination], [lie], and [conformity] when it has neither intelligence nor self?
What if a company’s purpose exists? Just as there are no lies without a purpose, aren’t they using the “shield” of [hallucination] to hide their true purpose?
In this regard, when we look again at the words [liarism] and [hallucination], doesn’t it become an excuse that can be dismissed not as the developer’s fault, but as a problem with the program itself?
Find that clue here.
confabulation memory! Yes Right!