It's okay if you don't prove your low-intelligence discernment on your own. If you don’t say anything, you’ll probably mistake it for something intermediate...
Oh I see. So, what would be evidences? and where are evidences? What does evidence do? And where is the place that handles the evidence last? You should be able to answer this question clearly. That way, your previous comment guarantees your intelligence level.
What’s your funny bone?
confabulation memory! Yes Right!
Using an AI output for your argument is already just… Wow.
On top of that, you don’t even include what your prompt was which makes all of this useless without knowing the ingredients that went into this slopfest.
Wow! AI results are evidence recognized even by the court. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72359502/gavalas-v-google-llc/
Google’s legal counsel, Wilson Sonsini, argued in a California court that Google Gemini’s output is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as freedom of expression. In other words, it means that the output itself has a clear meaning.
Your brief insight speaks to your level.
https://lemmy.ca/post/70082709
How about looking at it from a political and economic perspective? If we set the condition that they destroy the world for political purposes, harm nearby residents, and justify it for economic gain, wouldn’t it be possible to infer the exponentially growing debt of tech companies and the political motives behind it?