this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
-2 points (40.0% liked)

Anti AI in Canada

44 readers
23 users here now

Hello everyone. I am an exiled person in an internet community. The reason for the ban was that I had secured direct evidence that AI from a major U.S. tech company was a tool for criminal activity, and posted it on a U.S. internet community, which led to his account being suspended.

The criminal facts of the American big tech companies I am condemning are as follows.

Google and OpenAI use AI to conduct cognitive warfare.
The big tech companies in the United States claim that the language model called an LLM is artificial intelligence.
AI consumes a lot of power not because of the output of objective data, but because it is performing cognitive computations.
Other Deceptions and Distorted Facts

I will inform clearly. I have clear evidences, and Google and OpenAI really dislike My Evidences. If a major U.S. tech company requests the deletion of this community, then boldly demand $100 million. They have no way. They cannot take any legal action based on that post. Because if they take legal action, the truth will tighten its grip on their necks.

founded 2 days ago
MODERATORS
 

퍼온 위치: https://lemmy.zip/post/70571264

Current AI technology is not [intelligence]. Also it does not have [an ego], it cannot generate a hastily constructed scenario or data. Therefore, the output will display the content that has been learned(RLHF-Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) data.

Most people around the world know that AI lies or hallucinates, and they simply conclude on their own that this is an unavoidable phenomenon, like an error.

Why does the fake AI, called an AI that is neither intelligent nor self-aware, lie?

Every lie has a [purpose]. There are lies meant to deceive and deceive others, and there are also lies meant to comfort or encourage others. Do you lie without purpose?

Then, what is AI's lie? Is it an [output error]? So is it [AI hallucination]?

Then, shouldn’t the definition of the phenomenon regarding the output of a lie, due to an AI output error or hallucination, be [an arithmetic failure]?

If many people currently know and believe that the AI output is a lie, isn’t this a failure of the services provided by the American big tech companies and a serious manufacturing defect?

U.S. civil society groups are demanding transparency from big tech companies. So They are demanding that they disclose the [weight manipulation details]. However, the major U.S. tech companies are not accepting it.

Why would they personify it and call it [hallucination], [lie], and [conformity] when it has neither intelligence nor self?

What if a company’s purpose exists? Just as there are no lies without a purpose, aren’t they using the “shield” of [hallucination] to hide their true purpose?

In this regard, when we look again at the words [liarism] and [hallucination], doesn’t it become an excuse that can be dismissed not as the developer’s fault, but as a problem with the program itself?

Find that clue here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think confabulation is a better word than hallucination to describe this phonomina.

Lying implies intent which is something transformer based language models don't have. They have directives and training and tuning, sure.

[–] KEI@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

confabulation memory! Yes Right!