this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
144 points (98.6% liked)
Electric Vehicles
2941 readers
354 users here now
Overview:
Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.
Related communities:
- !automotive@discuss.tchncs.de
- !avs@futurology.today
- !byd@lemmy.world
- !ebike@lemm.ee
- !energy@slrpnk.net
- !geely@lemmy.world
- !micromobility@lemmy.world
- !polestar@lemmy.ca
- !rivian@lemmy.zip
- !teslamotors@lemmy.zip
- !xiaomi@lemdro.id
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I own a BYD
It's hilarious to see those who rant and rave in opposition to EVs starting to grow silent
An EV is just so goddam smooth and silent to drive compared to an ICE. I feel like I'm driving an absolute luxury car, compared to my old ICE car, that was with leather cabin, and had a 2.2 liter engine. A higher mid range car here.
But the EV is just a so much better experience to drive. We've had it for almost a year now, and I still enjoy that sense of luxury, and also something that is harder to describe, but it's like it drives with confidence, in a way I've never experienced with an ICE car. I guess it has to do with all the power being available in an instant, no matter what speed you drive.
I know now why people say, when you have had an electric, you will never go back.
It's the acceleration for me. It's like having a sports car the size of a truck.
The ID.4 isn't amazing in acceleration it's only 204 hp. But that's still enough to make it faster than our old Ice car that was 160 hp.
In European terms that makes it go 0-100 km/t in 8,5 sec. That's less than half a second faster than the old ICE car.
BUT, the acceleration is always instantly ready, and it's so quit I barely hear it inside the car.
We could have had a car that goes from 0-100 in less than 5 seconds for the same price, but we chose not to, for 2 reasons, number one I've seen neighbors have stupid things happen because they accelerated too quickly, like a small garden trailer turning over for going too fast through a roundabout. And quite frankly, I know myself well enough to know that I would have a very hard time not to give it a bit of pedal occasionally. The 2nd is that insurance on those faster cars is twice the insurance of our more moderate car.
But despite that, I agree that the acceleration is cool, because it's always ready, it's plenty fast IMO, and it quiet.
AND I also noticed that a bit of acceleration doesn't kill the economy nearly as much as it does in an ICE car. The efficiency when accelerating is way better.
I think it's because it reacts to the controls soo much faster.
In an ICE vehicle, especially with sticks shift, you're pushing and pulling all these gears and levers and pedals to control a transmission connected to an engine, or a brake, which will then attempt to produce the revolutions that you requested.
In an EV, it just does it. It's like the pedal is a direct control of the engine, which is connected directly to the wheels, which always has enough torque to carry out your request, even braking. Technically it still has a transmission etc., but it doesn't cause a delay like conventional transmissions.
In everyday driving, this shows most clearly when you're starting from a complete stop. You can find soo many more openings in traffic, when you trust you car to accelerate efficiently to merge into the traffic fluidly without getting in the way or getting into any risk when doing it.
I've been driving an ICE car lately for unrelated reasons, and it's definitely not a backstep you'll want to take. It feels like controlling a steam driven submarine using only pressure valves to steer through a mine field.
The pedal does not directly control the motor, it inputs a TPS to prevent burnouts. Transmissions don't cause a delay, the progressive torque curve of ICE makes multi speed transmissions necessary. The instant power of EVs is one reason Tesla owners have the highest crash rates.
Please, please, please don't do that. Cars are dangerous things and when traffic is so close that you're looking for openings, it is too congested to get in there. Safety should be your first priority and that means you're looking for openings that even a car with a tiny little one liter engine it has more than enough space to get in. If there isn't a big gap, just sit back and wait for one, It's a sign that your city needs more roads. Not a little more roads like the people say one more lane, a lot more lanes. Generally by the time people are asking for one more lane, they need five times as many lanes. Yes, that's expensive, maybe you should look into public transit instead.
Great safely folks. I've lost enough friends to drivers who were in a hurry. Please don't add another one to that list.
More lanes doesn't solve anything. It only increases traffic by induced demand.
What really helps to accommodate increasing traffic is to lower the speed limit, so more cars can fit in the same lane.
If you get induced demand that means your city is way behind in getting people where they want to be. If people didn't want to go places they would live in remote locations. Instead they live in cities because of the options.
Once again, maybe you should build better transit. Don't use induced demand as an excuse to not let people get places.
Yes, I have this exact feeling the most when I'm stopped completely at a bigger road I drive into. It's just so damned easy and smooth compared to an ICE car.
But EVs are going to crash the power grid. Can you imagine if every house got up at the same time everyday and made toast?! Chernobyl!!!
Data centres ok though.
Yeah, in the US the attitude has been changing dramatically fast recently. The combination of the Iran war fucking gas prices and the 2025/2026 model year bringing sub-four-second 0-100km to less than $50,000 has really convinced even some of the hardliners (and it helps that car manufacturers finally realized EVs don't have to look like dumpy sedans any more, LOOKING AT YOU TOYOTA). And Rivian proving EVs can offroad has really launched an entirely new market, which has been great fun.
Yea now we get to choose between hatchback on stilts that doesn't have all-wheel drive, hatchback on stilts that gets AWD as an expensive option but still won't be any good off road, as well as wagons on stilts. Ooh and also sedans on stilts.
Fuck this crossover craze, give me back sedans and wagons. An SUV should have actual ground clearance and be able to reliably drive more than one wheel in slippery conditions, not when a computer demands it. If it doesn't that, it's just a hatchback or wagon on stilts.
I'm sorry, I can't hear your reasonable desires and lamentations for the state of the industry, I'm too busy doing a 3.5s 0-100km in The Absolute Most Confusing EV Ever Produced
I mean admittedly I absolutely want one (lmao not for $115k) but only for the sheer perversity of it (it is objectively worse than any other option. On several metrics it even manages to suck worse than the cybertruck). And since I'm not exactly a member of a large demographic, certainly not large enough to support an entire product line like this, I'm damned curious just what the fuck market segment they think they're targeting with this one.
Yanks don't know what high fuel prices are
They just have shitty, inefficient vehicles, because they make cars and motorbikes that are a metaphor for their country
Overweight and slow.
Yep!
Lazy, all about making things bigger rather than better, the thought of something resembling agility is truly terrifying
And obnoxious. Being obnoxious is a feature
I had a neighbour ask if my motorbike was electric, because they never hear me being an obnoxious cunt
It's a 2008 bike, but my penis size isn't correlated with how much noise I can make