this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
67 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

5164 readers
240 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The relevant section is blunt. "The Software is licensed to you, not sold," the EULA states. "You are granted a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, and personal license to play or use the Software for your private, non-commercial use on the system or device it was intended for."

The terms also restrict renting, modifying, or obtaining games through unauthorised means. Nothing in there is new, technically. Sony's EULA has always said this. The timing is what makes it land differently right now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And yet still, PlayStation loyalists will say "never Xbox" even as Sony continues to stab them in their backs.

Just like Android users who say they want to get away from Google, all the while shouting "never Apple" despite Apple claiming to stand for privacy while Google does not hide the fact that they sell your data to the highest bidder.

Some people really are their own worst enemies.

Not that "the other company" is always better. But still, it's fine to switch sides when the company you're with does you dirty. I was a PlayStation guy. I'm with Xbox now because Xbox had the All Access programme that let me get an Xbox for $35 a month (with GamePass). Yes I paid like $900 and was locked into GamePass for 2 years, but I was "locked in" at the original price when month-to-month payers were paying twice what I was paying. And I ultimately saved $20 overall. I would have a PS5 if Sony offered the same deal. At times I thought I was going PS6 next gen. Microsoft got my business this generation. I was willing to switch. I also switched to iPhone when Android phones all sucked one year and I needed one because the one I had needed to be factory reset every couple weeks. The carrier told me not to do it, that people stick with one or the other for a reason. I said nah, fuck that, look at my choices and tell me what you'd do. Right, the iPhone. No regrets. If I needed a phone right now, I'd grab a Fairphone 6+. Actually kind of want it, but I don't need one right now (and can't afford one right now either).

Don't be loyal to one camp when the other is doing better. Be willing to switch sides. But not just that. These companies have to know people are willing to switch. That they aren't locked in. That they have a choice and have the stones to make it.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just like Android users who say they want to get away from Google, all the while shouting "never Apple" despite Apple claiming to stand for privacy while Google does not hide the fact that they sell your data to the highest bidder.

despite Apple claiming to stand for privacy

CLAIMING.

They're both multibillion dollar tech corps that sell your data. Trust neither.

I should also point out that one has had a defacto walled garden for decades now, the other is still putting up the walls. But regardless, trust neither.

Don't switch to Apple. Switch to actually private operating systems like GrapheneOS or Linux.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

CLAIMING

Billion dollar lawsuit if you can prove they are lying.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 1 points 13 hours ago

Sue them for what? Being lying liars with pants on fire?

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

They have closed source code, so nobody besides Apple's engineers and programmers can verify those claims. And since they work for Apple they have an inherent bias.

Since their claims cannot be independently verified, we cannot take their claims at face value. It doesn't prove they're lying, but it also doesn't prove that they're telling the truth. All people know is what their marketing department puts out.

But if that's enough for you to believe that they respect privacy, then I have a bridge to sell you as well...

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

Engineers leave. Sometimes on bad terms where they have a strong desire to hurt their former employer.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Linux, yes. GrapheneOS requires you to pay the piper. You have to buy a Google phone (i.e. pay iPhone 17 Pro money for an iPhone 11-powered phone), so Google already double dipped. You're just preventing them from triple dipping by selling your data. You still have to contribute to their bullshit.

They are coming out with Motorola phones that run GrapheneOS. Word is, they won't be cheap.

I'm curious about Linux. I'm hearing you can install it on any Android phone without root, but I fear I may be seeing AI slop in my YouTube feed. I don't trust it.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You have to buy a Google phone (i.e. pay iPhone 17 Pro money for an iPhone 11-powered phone), so Google already double dipped.

1: You can buy used, which means not giving money to Google

2: In what way is this "already double dipped"? Double dipping would be selling your data after selling you the phone, but you reserved that for "triple dipping"

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I consider it double dipping to charge 2026 prices on 2019 performance. They're saving the money not using performant parts and they're still charging full price. The old Nexus phones were the same way, except they were cheaper than flagships.

Used is a thing but it's kind of sketchy. And an older phone isn't going to be supported as long.

You can get Pixel 10's on Swappa for under $500 in good condition

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Used devices are a thing.

Also, what are you doing on your phone that ypyve noticed a performance difference in the last several years?

Nothing I know anyone in my life, does anything with their phone, that one from 5 years ago couldn't so just as well (with proper software updates, like graphine).

Tl:;Dr why do you need the latest phone?

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

I never said I needed the latest phone, and I'm not going to argue a point I don't believe in. I have a 7 year old Android phone that still rocks. I also have a 2 year old iPhone. Guess which one has better typing? And a few other things better?

All newer phones are good for is AI.