this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
204 points (97.2% liked)

World News

57771 readers
1379 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

A minister of AI makes sense, you can’t just ignore it.

A stable economic environment allows for us to make investments today that pay off in the future, but in a war like environment you need to mobilize the infrastructure you have and build support around it. Whether we like it or not we have a number of valuable resources in the ground and we need to start moving those resources elsewhere so we can invest in a renewable future.

There’s a lot of stuff I disagree with Carney on, but what I appreciate about him is that he is a pragmatist. He understands that at times you have to put your personal values aside and take the action that makes the most sense.

Winston Churchill was a racist, but he had the balls to take on Germany and not bend. Lincoln hindered post war reconstruction and his authoritarian overreach was unprecedented but he was the only person willing to tear a nation apart to rebuild it.

Leaders need to be able to put themselves aside to make decisions that produce the most utility for those they lead. This means occasionally getting pie on your face or going against your own heart. A snake acts dishonestly with malice, that’s not what’s going on here. Our current circumstances demand pragmatism we can’t crucify the only person in the room willing to act like one in the face of that.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I agree with what you said, but gotta nitpick on the Lincoln example. Lincoln explicitly did not want to tear the US apart when he became President. He was an abolitionist but his goal was a peaceful transition away from slavery over generations. This moderate stance was unacceptable to the Southern states and so they went to war because they wanted slavery to be permanent and for it to be spread.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 1 points 3 days ago

lol you’re right but it doesn’t flow as nicely.

Ima big Lincoln fan, greatest leader of all time IMO

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 3 points 4 days ago

This was really well put, thanks!

[–] sensualsunset@lemmy.world -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Socialism, not pragmatism my friend. Comparing him to Churchill doesn't make much sense as he's way less enthusiastic. And typical man on the internet justifying racism for the sake of economic gain. As a climate scientist, renewable now. GTFO with your oil and gas.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 5 points 3 days ago

I don’t think you understood a single word of what I said.