this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
79 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
929 readers
528 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I honestly have no idea what this means but I don't think I like it.
Idk why but the specific language of "classic" feels funnily absurd to me. Like funny in an awful what the fuck way.
You know, it reminds me of this time I said something mean about Jordan Peterson (back when he was mostly a local problem) and a teenage relative defended him saying something like "actually he's more of a classic liberal" as if that was positive or something. I don't think anyone understood why that cracked me up so bad. I don't think I understand it either but it still makes me laugh.
I don't want to dunk on them too hard because I think we should politely forget cringe takes from teenagers and they turned out okay in the end.
Tbf defending someone by saying they're a classical liberal is pretty funny. "They're just this other bad thing"
But I'm glad to hear they're alright
Sooo ... stuck in the 18 hundreds? Which sounds about right.
Definitely as in classic Athens