this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
54 points (96.6% liked)

PC Master Race

22260 readers
688 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I will never understand why it's called the Windows subsystem for Linux instead of the other way around? Doesn't Linux system for Windows make so much more sense?

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Windows: subsystem for Linux

[–] esc@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because their earlier thingy that added partial posix compatibility was called 'windows services for unix', they just continued with backwards naming scheme.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Is it because it's dropping the implied "running," as in "Windows Services for (running) UNIX (programs)" and "Windows Subsystem for (running) Linux (programs)"?

[–] idealpink@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago

I don’t like the name but I don’t think so.

Linux system for Windows = adapted Linux to be able to run in Windows Windows subsystem = adapted Windows to be able to run regular linux