this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
186 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2359 readers
449 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

French Art historian Nathalie Trouveroy shared footage with Le Monde from her personal archives of the Tiananmen Square protests, shedding new light on how the Chinese regime violently repressed the student protests in June 1989.

Archived

The linked article contains a video (17 min). Here is an invidious link to this video with the comments being in French.

[...]

The analysis of previously unseen images obtained by "Le Monde" and leading testimonies provide a better understanding of how the Chinese regime gradually shifted to the violent repression of the student demonstrations in the spring of 1989.

Spring 1989, Tiananmen Square. At the heart of the student demonstrations, a young expatriate, Nathalie Trouveroy, films the Beijing protesters, their slogans, their enthusiasm and their fear with her Hi8 video camera. These images, which remained in a family setting for a long time, are unpublished archives obtained by Le Monde.

Her husband, Guy Trouveroy, was then a political adviser at the Belgian Embassy in Beijing. For seven weeks, the couple were privileged witnesses to the regime's hesitation, torn between dialogue, obstruction and repression of the demonstrators. When the movement turns in favour of democratic measures, the communist government sends tanks against the population. On the night of 3-4 June 1989, the massacre took place. The repression would spread throughout China.

Since then, the Chinese authorities have been trying to erase Tiananmen from the collective memory. But, thirty-eight years later, Nathalie Trouveroy's never-before-seen video and photo archives have come to light. With these family images, the Trouveroy couple intend to preserve the memory of the victims of the bloody repression of the Tiananmen movement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bjc@scribe.disroot.org 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

incredible. i hope you’re paid well

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wumaos are notoriously underpaid.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is that like a racist insult or something?

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know wtf a wumao is, so maybe? You tell me?

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does seem kind of racist. Someone who defends China is automatically a paid Chinese agent?

I live within the imperial core and can read and see how much better China is than the bloodthirsty American empire.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Again, “wumao” is not a racist term. The whitest guy could be a wumao, there’s no racial component to it.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you don't understand how that could seem racist, I don't know what to tell ya, lol.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course you don’t, because it’s nonsense.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You honestly can't think of a reason why that would be considered racist? You fuckin stupid, bro?

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don’t sound too non confrontational now.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your nickname suggests otherwise.

Bottom line, trying to argue that “wumao” is a racist slur is hilariously dumb. It’s a derogatory term coined by Chinese people that refers to CCP apologists, regardless of race.

So please, clarify: do you think it’s “racist” because I’m using a mandarin term, whatever that means, or, ironically enough, because you assumed that every CCP apologist must be of Han descend?

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never said it was racist, just that it seems like it could be interpreted that way.

[–] mabeledo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right. Since we are making shit up, it could also be interpreted as art.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

If you don't understand the definition of art, yeah sure!

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not a big fan of history, I see.

[–] ManixT@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your made up version of history or reality?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tell me what you think happened in tiananmen square in 1989.

[–] ManixT@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Chinese government murdered people who disagreed with them.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah-ha, gotcha! Most of the violence did not occur inside the square itself, but outside it, on the streets nearby!

iamverysmart.bmp

[–] ManixT@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I don't know if you think you're supporting china, but you're hurting the Chinese people.

This isn't a "china bad" thing. I want Chinese people to be able to speak their mind without worry of being murdered, silenced, or jailed.

I like china in general. Let's try to be better people and not oppress them or come up with alternate realities to not to hurt the feelings of billionaires in charge.