Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
6. Defend your opinion
This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
view the rest of the comments


No? Not to me anyways. The issue with beastiality is the lack of consent. At least, to me? Maybe there's different takes on that, but animals can't consent. So.. when you anthropomorphize them and the wolves start talking? They can now consent, and my problem goes away.
But that's just imagining a fictional scenario in which having sex with an animal is alright. It seems exactly like the anime thing where the girl who looks 10 is actually hundreds of years old so it's totally ok for her to be sexualized for people who want to have sex with children. Saying a character clearly designed to look and act like a child is actually over 18 doesn't make it suddenly become moral. Because it's designed to look like a child. On purpose.
I don't see how anything healthy could come from people imagining scenarios where some people might consider it moral to fuck their dog. It's normalizing something abhorrent and actually makes me more worried now because before I wasn't thinking about people getting themselves used to their fantasy idea an animal can consent to sex with a person and then misinterpreting a wagging tail or a dog bumping it's rear end into you because it itches.
It's just feeding and normalizing something that's in no way alright.
... is anyone doing that? Or are we just making up terrible slippery slopes in our heads?
You've said your only problem with bestiality is consent. Your opinions don't really effect the scales in my mind much after that. However, yes, I've known one guy who very likely did something like that. He was in prison because they found videos of him fucking the family dog on his phone. Given some of the comments in here I'd be far more surprised to find he didn't have similar art and social connections than to find out he did.