this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
703 points (99.2% liked)

Atheism

6347 readers
117 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] d.rizo@piefed.social 90 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe we should start reviewing churches the same way: Nice church but the guy at the front was talking funny about his imaginary friend... Only two stars.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol the stained glass was beautiful but they hate gays here

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The priest clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Matthew 6:5-6 states “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”. One star for not obeying the Bible.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You are not wrong but Jesus wasn't against group prayer, he intended on building a church a few pages later

Matthew 16:18

And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.

You should have referenced a couple of pages after that where he has something to say about preachers

Matthew 23:8-12

“But you are not to be called ‘Rabbi,’ for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth ‘father,’ for you have one Father, and he is in heaven. Nor are you to be called instructors, for you have one Instructor, the Messiah. The greatest among you will be your servant. For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

Jesus had some pretty rad opinions even if his reasoning was often flaky

[–] SarahValentine@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.

Peter was demonstrably a superstitious idiot throughout the gospels. Jesus was just letting us all know what kind of people would be in charge of the organized religions with his name on them.

[–] suigenerix@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, sure, he's a little flaky. But God is just so perfect, all loving, and timeless...

Exodus 21:20-21:

Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 1 points 20 hours ago

That was probably progressive at that time though… I mean, the ones who wrote it, not the imaginary space guy.

[–] SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Matthean Jesus is cut your balls off for god levels of wild.

I'm not sure one can just pick lines out of random Gospels as 'what Jesus said', the US got really weird with that a while back with a red letter 4 gospel meme thing going viral.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not sure one can just pick lines out of random Gospels as 'what Jesus said',

That's literally how Christianity works. I don't know of any denomination that follows the entire Bible exactly. It's not even possible because the text is self-contradictory in places.

[–] SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

contradiction kinda the point, there's four gospels even just in the mainline canon

if one can't cope with contradictions there is little point in even attempting to approach scripture

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

in places.

https://philb61.github.io/

edit: not made for mobile

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Meme? I've got a red letter Bible from the 70s.

[–] SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Red letters bibles were meme'ing hard in the US before the 1970's but the 70's is where memetics pops up as a theory afair.

A bit like apples were falling before Newton figured out it's because we live in a clockwork universe.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

This right here. If you're going to post a review of a church, review them based on how their actions conflict with what they claim to believe.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More importantly, if your faith is having an effect on policy.. guess what, your religion must now start paying taxes.

Why should the rest of us pay for your idiotic ideas that are now turning into policy and law.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That would gladly pay the taxes if it means they get to force their religion on people. They already openly.defy election law by endorsing candidates and "vote yes on prop 66” statements during services, inviting prosecution because they expect to win in court.

[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, if people understand "no taxation without representation" well, then logically: "no representation without taxation" should be equally easy to get behind.

They are already in our politics, may as well get them to pay for that privilege.