this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
294 points (97.4% liked)

memes

22246 readers
4223 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
294
Damn (media.piefed.zip)
submitted 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/memes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 48 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The whole 2015 article:

Sylvia Driskell, a 66-year-old woman from Auburn, Nebraska, filed a federal lawsuit last week titled Driskell v. Homosexuals. Driskell, acting as her own lawyer and the ambassador of “God, And His, Son Jesus Christ,” would like the District Court in Omaha to determine whether being gay is a sin. She did not cite any previous court cases in her petition, which is seven pages long and written in cursive, instead relying on the consul of Merriam-Webster and the Bible. Driskell asks, “Why are judges passing laws, so sinners can break religious, and moral laws. Will all the judges of this Nation, judge God to be a lier [sic].”

The civil-rights case has been assigned to Judge John M. Gerrard, and no summons have been issued. Many people around the country have been surprised to learn that they were being sued by some person they had never met in Nebraska.

Man, I hope I get deposed
— Dan Savage (@fakedansavage) May 5, 2015

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2015/05/66-year-old-nebraska-woman-sues-all-gay-people.html

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 29 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 35 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

my favorite part is where they explain that for her to claim that this is under the jurisdiction of a federal court, she would have to prove that there are no gay people who are citizens of the state of Nebraska

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Possibly true. If neither she nor the judge are.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

if I understand correctly, it's actually because she is. it explains that in order for a civil case to be under the jurisdiction of a federal court (and a civil case must be what she's attempting, since she doesn't cite any federal law to allege that the defendants have broken it), none of the plaintiffs can be citizens of the same state as any of the defendants. otherwise, presumably, it would fall under the jurisdiction of whichever state both parties are citizens of. so because both she and some gay people are Nebraskans, the case would have to be handled by a Nebraska state court, not a federal court

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I was making a joke about there being like two people in Nebraska and here you are vomiting up law larp at me.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

oh, yeah I didn't get that at all. good premise though, sounds like it woulda been funny

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Why not? Let people do what they want. Catholicism has its issues but it's nowhere close to whatever the fuck american protestants or the other three billion denominations they came up with are doing.