this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
17 points (90.5% liked)

chat

8645 readers
399 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I asked Claude for authors similar to Mearsheimer and Carl Schmitt, ones that have the same observations on the vapidness of international law but don’t come to rightwing conclusions. 

Then I mentioned the general collapse of credibility in the system, and how power can reestablish (and has in the past reestablished) this credibility. The answer came basically down to that credibility does not need to be established so long as there is no alternative, so long as the disillusioned don’t organize. 

Then as a joke I asked if this conversation puts me on a list and got the answer that, no Anthropic doesn’t share anything with governments (ofc), on top of that I don’t even need to be put on a list, the very fact that I ask the question means I’m a spineless lib that is no danger to anyone (fair enough).

I guess my question would be if anyone knows interesting authors that deal with these topics. And if using Claude this way is stupid, I personally find it very useful to discover new authors (or find very specific products or places, and internet search has become completely useless in general), but I don‘t want to share to much of my private thoughts with the company that brought you the targeting for the Iran war, nor do I want to be influenced too much by them in what I read…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

I would use a non-western LLM for this, and instead of rightwing say pro-imperialist, ahistorical, sociologically unreal, or insert some other aspect of capitalist takes here, give the Markov chain pattern reader something specific it can make 1-1 connections with.

I don't think its stupid, I'd probably use it for so-called apolitical things and non-analysis since LLMs generally need work there, but keep in mind if you deep dive you'll see it be flat out wrong.

I only use western llms for my resume since I keep eating bans asking intricate questions about the writings and analysis of Hegel's most famous student that did his thesis on Epicurus, or even merely using them as whine bot when the cats refuse to listen to me complain about my day. Take that libs, even my day is political.