this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
24 points (90.0% liked)
RetroGaming
29677 readers
61 users here now
Vintage gaming community.
Rules:
- Be kind.
- No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm on the fence with achievements honestly. On one hand, they are kinda coolio and I don't mind them. But also, except for private progress, they're (as a whoile - dunno how RetroAchievements works ) worthless.
Achievement - First Steps! (watched 1s of intro), Prepared (picked up a gun you cannot progress in tutorial without), Armed & Loaded (reloaded said gun), Questionable Choices (killed tutorial enemy you were forced to kill by tutorial)...
Or the other side of coin: Hard and actually cool achievements...that are owned by 1/4 of the players because most folk just cheat them.
So, well implemented they can be fun trackers. But they lost any value when it comes to bragging rights, and are quite often heavily overdone or treated more as a tracker for devs to see which parts of game are accessible and which are not.
Absolutely hate these kinds of achievements! They are just noise, why do you as a dev would want to add noise into your game?
To be fair most of the time really hard achievements do have low percentages, at least on Steam. People usually just don't bother with "complete the entire game without taking a single hit". They can cheat but I doubt many do.