this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
619 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

86982 readers
3118 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The story itself is pretty ridiculous. He starts with a conclusion, and then looks for stories to support that narrative. What should happen, is first establish criteria to measure if an AI project has been successful or not and then measure projects against that criteria. Instead the author uses anecdotal stories of projects he has heard failed, so it must all be wrong.

Not one mention of the advances in medical research using AI, because it goes against his narrative.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

If you read the article, he talks specifically about that. The people using AI for real shit, like protein folding, can use it to improve their work, because they're experts at it, and know when the AI is fucking up. The AI helps, but could never, ever, replace them.

The other question Suresh implicitly raises is: "How can you reconcile the failure of AI in the enterprise with the individual claims of skilled technologists who insist that AI is helping them do great work?" The answer is that these AI users are "centaurs" – experienced workers who are assisted by automation on terms that they set for themselves.

Thanks to their skill and experience, these workers possess discernment, the ability to tell good code from bad, and (more importantly) good uses of code-generation tools from bad.

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Give some anecdotal stories of AI advancing healthcare.

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 hours ago

If you don't recognize advances in research as a benefit, I'm done. Thanks.