this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
50 points (98.1% liked)
Canada
12516 readers
576 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
π Meta
πΊοΈ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
ποΈ Cities / Local Communities
- Anmore (BC)
- Burnaby (BC)
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- East Gwillimbury (ON)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kingston (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Niagara Falls (ON)
- Niagara-on-the-Lake (ON)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Sarnia (ON)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Squamish (BC)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Whistler (BC)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
π Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- MontrΓ©al Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
π» Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
π΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- Buy Canadian
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Canadian Skincare
- Churning Canada
- Quebec Finance
- Canada Grown Business
π£οΈ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
π Social / Culture
- 2 North American 4 You (Shitposting & Memes, North America focus)
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- Canadian Gaming
- Eh Buddy Hoser (Shitposting & Memes, Canada focus)
- EhVideos (Canadian video media)
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au QuΓ©bec
- Maple Music (music)
π Other Relevant Communities
Rules
-
Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
-
Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oh good gravy. Data centres should be in the USA
We should have data centres in Canada to keep our data in-house.
The solution is to build them up in the Arctic where it's cold all the time. Might even drive the billionaires to consider global warming for once.
No power sources in the arctic.
He can run an extension cord from his mom's basement in Mississauga.
Not yet, but there are also no data centres around here yet either... Sooo instead of rushing to build data centres, just electrify the north. SMRs are coming, could be a good project haha
You should take a drive out of your city centre some day.
Not sure the point you're trying to make, but sure
The point is that it's citidiots that think the "arctic is always cold" If you ever traveled north of Bloor street you might be shocked to find a distinct lack of igloos. Some people even have running water and telephones!
Alert sitting chill at 3Β° in the middle of summer... Seems cold to me. Not balls freezing, but still significantly cooler than places further south.
More realistically, Iqaluit is 9Β°
I fail to see the part where I mention people living in igloos... Sure if you go further south you end up with more temperate weather, but I'm talking about building in places where there is plenty of land to take over to build data centres. Places that are nearly uninhabited, perfect for a data centre lmao.
So drive there. Oh, you'll need to bring the road with you. Also bring all your building materials. And a power plant. Bring your staff too. And food and housing for them. Think of all the money you'll save for that ginormous temperature differential.
If I had billions of dollars, it would be great. Coax the government into the expansion for grants along the way.
Now you're thinking! Get the government to pay for your shitty idea! Drop ship it from orbit!
Man for a second I thought this was Reddit with the lack of awareness... Sweet fuck, keep it up bud! You must not be seeing the way the 1% roll, or you don't understand satire or something idk. Sad regardless...
I was thinking the same thing! You're a know-it-all-fuck-all who doesn't proofread comments, even after an edit! βοΈ
You seem to have the wrong person here flagged as a "know-it-all-fuck-all" sorry to say. Might want to consider buying a mirror and learning how to stop while you're ahead.
Yay! I'm winning!
Stupidity knows no bounds. Thankfully there's a way to block morons so you never see them again. Hopefully one day you grow self awareness and a modicum of intelligence.
Bye!
It actually makes more sense to build them in Alberta than most of the US to be honest. If these things are going to be run off fossil fuels anyway, it is more efficient to build them local to the fuel rather than building pipelines to ship it elsewhere then burning it there to run those data centers.
The article says itself that the data center is planned to be closed loop water (so effectively no water use) but then assumes that the natural gas power plant WILL be consuming water, when those too can be built with closed loop water systems.
Personally I'd like to see all datacenters require 100% renewable power going forward, but that's not realistically happening.
Keep this shit out of my water.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/08/meta-datacenter-ai-wyoming-water
You really will throw every single possible infraction against AI, no mattery how tiny. You're now blaming AI for a contractor disposing of wastewater during construction that ended up having some higher levels of a bacteria in it? How is that in any way the fault of AI? The construction of datacenters isn't somehow different such that it's more likely to generate bacteria wastewater. This is possible in any construction project.
Itβs a closed-water data centre owned by Meta which is exactly what has been approved in Alberta.
And what does that have to do with construction water treatment by a specific contractor?
I too can dump contaminated water just doing renovations on my home by leaving it out or not following proper procedures for disposing of it.
There isn't a special AI related cause to it. It's a relatively minor bacteria that primarily impacts immunocomprised patients when it shows up (which is rare)
Thousand acre ai compute facilities offer significant drawbacks and no tangible benefits to Alberta.
Do not expect that to ever happen. Meta's facility will use 1GW of power. Right now as I write this, Alberta is generating a total of 10GW. There are something like 25GW of proposed data centre projects in the queue for the province. Renewables cannot and will not be used for facilities that use this much power. It's impossible.
Where the fuck did you get your numbers? Alberta has almost 25 GW of installed capacity right now, and peak demand of something in the neighborhood of 13-14 GW
In 2024, they installed about 1.4GW of Solar and Wind alone.
https://ippsa.com/industry
I said 10GW generation not capacity, pay attention.
How does that invalidate the fact that there is 10-12 GW of spare capacity above peak demand already built?
Or that there was 1.4GW of capacity installed in 2024 that could be used to power this kind of data center?
How are your arguments in any way actual arguments against building this?
You're aware that the wind isn't always blowing, and the sun isn't always shining, right?
It's critical to understand the difference between MC and TNG. You should learn about them before going off on people. It's clear you don't understand how the energy grid works.
I can throw acronyms around too.
LCOS for batteries at this point is low enough to make even "the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing" renewables viable.
If renewables are so poor a choice for power, why are they being built in such massive quantities even in places that hate renewables?
Maybe if you understood how the world worked better, you wouldn't get so focused on arguing about what used to be possible and instead focus on what is possible now.
Instead, you're arguing to not build datacenters in Alberta and instead have them in the US because.... renewables aren't always available?
You're in this thread hoping that paradigm shifts in battery tech, AB building refineries, and using what you incorrectly assumed is 10GW of unused headroom in the power grid, all for ai compute facilities.
I'm not sure why you're gunning so hard for ai compute facilities to be built in Alberta specifically, and your unsophisticated understanding of the way energy works makes it hard to take your position seriously.
What do you mean paradigm shift? BC is literally building 5 grid-scale batteries right now. This isn't future tech, it's something that can be purchased and installed today.
I'm arguing for them in Alberta for the same reason Alberta is arguing for pipelines to be built through BC. They're going to be built somewhere, may as well get the benefits of having them here.
500 megawatts across an entire province to be built out over the course of a few years.
I don't see where your optimism comes from.
A) "across an entire province" is only 5 locations B) The currently largest active grid scale battery is 3.2GWh, in California. There are projects in planning or under construction to reach up to 40GWh. Again, this is solved tech that you can buy and build today. If you're going to drop a few billion on datacenters, there's not really anything stopping you from dropping a few billion more on solar/wind and batteries. Microsoft is dropping massive money on a Nuclear fusion plant in Washington state that's already under construction.
Wrong. Potentia-Viridi BESS isn't built yet. Why are you posting things in this thread that are factually incorrect?
Alberta has 11 of these storage systems too, which I suppose you'd bring up if you knew anything. It's great that battery storage exists but imagining that it will be able to supply ai compute facilities is naive.
Oh sorry I didn't know nuclear fusion was solved tech.
My friend, you're dreaming. You're way out over your skis talking about these things.
Sure. That's why companies are pouring billions into grid scale batteries. I guess you know they aren't worth it better than they do.
This is also an incorrect assumption, ,and a premise that municipalities all over North America are rejecting. What do you make of that?
It's not an incorrect assumption. There are far more datacenters being built now than ever before, despite the news about specific locations blocking them. There are still plenty going ahead.
What's the point. Its still an american company building it won't create any long term jobs. And America laws still apply to all data in it.
It will create some long term jobs, while it's not like an office with hundreds of people inside of every day it it still requires significant physical upkeep and management.
It's not like there's a lack of space in the area and this will take away from higher density offices.
Alberta does not make fuel, they make a tar sludge that needs to be refined in the US to make fuel. 100 years of tar sands and they still haven't invested in a decent local refinery.
Alberta does not have the refinery capacity to make "local fuel".
If they're building massive data centers, and power plants, why not build refineries too?
Idk if you've ever play Factorio, but it's the same premise:
Complexity: Essentially, there isn't enough demand to justify the expense and massive investment of money and resources. With petroleum refinement, you get byproducts and you need to either store them or make products from them, so it's not just a plant or two, it's a whole set of them.
Cost: Alberta is rich in extracted, stable crude oil and bitumen, but refineries are expensive. Like, really, really expensive. It doesn't make economic sense to heavily subsidize its processing locally, when it's so much cheaper to send it to the USA and elsewhere.
I do play factorio. Complexity is the point...
However, these power plants don't need or use the oil refineries you're referring to. They are natural gas power plants, and thus need natural gas refineries, which are MUCH simpler and cheaper because it's mostly just a cleaning step. Alberta already refines and consumes about 50-60% of it's natural gas production.
You're talking out your ass.
How?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas-fired_power_plant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-gas_processing