this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
384 points (97.3% liked)

memes

22215 readers
3251 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Take the total tariff income, divide it by the number of people in the country, and send out the checks.

It's the ONLY legitimate way to handle it.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

That sounds fair in theory, but would not hold up as soon as the first person felt slighted and challenged those terms in court.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Let them. It's better than "nobody will let it be fair so we won't even try."

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

From a fairness point of view, for non essential goods, if you paid higher prices with the tariffs you would also have paid it without the tariffs, so you weren't really harmed by it.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Essential and non-essential are almost meaningless distinctions for most goods people use on a daily basis. I could LIVE on beans and water. Do I NEED toothpaste? Aspirin? How much I allowed to enjoy something before it's a non-essential good?

People paid more for something because they were forced to, and it wasn't for any economically necessary reason. Nitpicking the necessity of the good is a cheap excuse to do nothing, not a gotcha.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

If paid the higher value with tariffs you would pay it any way. And if everyone was willing to pay the higher price then it would already have been higher. That's how capitalism works.

Companies that increased prices because of tariffs probably lost customers in the process.