this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
193 points (99.5% liked)

News

38643 readers
1320 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Army has used up much of its stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during its five-month war with Iran, according to three people familiar with the data, raising concerns about the military's ​readiness for future conflicts.

The missiles are principally the Army's surface-to-surface weapons, known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). The U.S. has used "virtually all" of these weapons, according to two of the sources.

The ‌degree to which the military is running out of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles has not been previously reported.

The long-range munitions are an important part the military's arsenal, allowing accurate strikes from a safe distance. U.S.-supplied ATACMS have played a key role in the war in Ukraine, allowing Ukrainian forces to attack targets inside Russia. The PrSM is a newer, more advanced generation that will replace the ATACMS, which have a shorter range.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 5 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

I'm having trouble deciding if that's a good thing or a bad thing.

It would have been better for Ukraine to use them against Russia.

On the other hand, now it's less likely trump will start another war.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

We still need him to completely decimate the world's oil production. Can't give up now.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago

Honestly, I think it would be a good idea to bomb both the Saudi and Iranian oil fields. Let’s just get this over with. That’s where it’s going to end up anyway.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Now less likely Trump will start another war

I am not convinced.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Well, i did say LESS likely, not UNLIKELY.

He's really good at doing stupid things that other people pay the price for. And the midterms are about 3 months away. So it's almost time for another distraction.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

The october surprise should be fun. And by "fun" I mean "what the fuck is it now?"

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Cue Micro Rube-io clamoring for the dismantling of the ICC and ratcheting up his "international left-wing antifa terrorist" rhetoric to not only go after anyone left of MAGA, but also cancel the midterms by declaring a state of emergency due to "terrorism".

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Why wouldn't you allow them some success at least? The US military might not be able wo win any actual war but against their mostly complacent "we will only protest every few months on a weekend to not inconvenience anyone"-population they might be enough.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

He recently said Greenland will defiantly be under US control before he leaves office

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The ground missiles are near out but bombs and icbms and air to ground munitions are still in stock. They could decide to b52 carpet bomb too.

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

B52s and carpet bombing? Not with the Chinese MANPADS making their way to the battlefield. There is a reason B52's aren't being used in Iran. They are already dropping reaper drones like swatting flies. And ICBMS are super expensive, and it's hard to tell if you are starting a nuclear war of just attacking Cuba.

https://abcnews.com/Politics/iran-shot-30-us-reaper-drones-us-official/story?id=134597622

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-portable_air-defense_system

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I don't doubt it but it's the big orange idiot in charge. That does randomize it a bit. I mean what's kept him from making stupid decisions so far?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 7 hours ago

100% a good thing. Ukraine having them would be best, but failing that at least they're out of the hands of the US war machine.