this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
839 points (97.1% liked)

Work Reform

17474 readers
2067 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For the last point, it is easier to tax unfavored behavior into the ground than it is to outright forbid it. That's why sin taxes exist after all.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I don't think it would be difficult to outright forbid self-checkout at all, actually.

There's a difference between enforcing laws on individuals and enforcing laws on businesses. Businesses can't exactly run and hide, if they're using self-checkout they're going to get found out. That's distinct from something like the drug trade, which is all underground and hidden.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Some people fucking love self checkout. If you ban it, you'll have disability advocacy groups up your arse on behalf of autistic people and others with social anxiety.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

ADA compliance will kill the entire thing. You can't charge someone for accommodation of a disability that prevents them from using the self checkout. All the human-staffed registers will be posted as handicap accessible, and they will default to the "discounted" self-checkout price.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, I'm just saying, this wouldn't be a hard law to enforce.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would be a very dumb law that has zero chance of passing. It would be like banning cars to keep horses employed.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Except horses aren't allowed to vote, so actually, it's nothing like that.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ahh, it's why we can't actually help the kids and Boomers get all the help. Those who vote right?

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

when I recently went back to using a staffed lane, I told the folks I had anxiety about being in the lane, and the cashiers comforted me.

I have social anxiety, practicing in the staff lane, has helped me with this. At least, in this small area of life.

I get the point, but if a person doesnt ever push themselves, they wont grow.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My concern here is less about enforcement and more about getting the law passed and through the court system in the first place.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

You don't think they'll drag such a tax through the court system? Our enemies don't want any restraints on businesses, anything we try to do will be fought.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

We've given up so much as consumers. There was a time when people would be pissed that the store was making them do unpaid labor. Now we don't bat an eye.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do sin taxes really stop anything though?

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

They definitely have some effect, simply because they push prices up.