this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
392 points (96.4% liked)

GetBetter

146 readers
6 users here now

anything science based to improve, health, mental, technics, skills

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I don't understand what this adds that the "traditional" recipe style is missing. I even see some things it's lacking. For example, the last 4 ingredients should be mixed together independently before folding in to the base.

I don't dislike this format, but I just don't see why it's so revolutionary.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

It clearly shows the sequential and parallel threads of execution:

  • up/down: parallel.
  • left to right: sequential

It clearly shows the sequence of produced intermediate results, split and merging points:

  • a row that splits into two rows is one step producing more than one result. Like spliting yolk and whites.
  • many rows becoming one: merging node. Like baking many ingredients.
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If the last 4 ingredients need mixing together first, then you simply have a mix column with just those ingredient rows under the mix column from above to show that those get mixed independently in parallel. This recipe implies that is unnecessary for this food though.

[–] Luccus@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For example, the last 4 ingredients should be mixed together independently before folding in to the base.

Isn't that indicated by the combination of rows?

I like this chart. It even allows for ~~multithreaded~~ multi-person baking, because the combination of rows indicates where processes are merged (and need to be done).

Edit: I may be dumb. A mix step is missing below the mix block of the other ingredients, but it could easily be included.

[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Right, I was about to say that the big near-square in the middle bottom could easily be used to indicate this as a separate process. I really like this format!

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Because it fits on a little card. Which everyone used to keep recipes on for a long time. Little boxes full of recipe cards.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Luckily most recipes won't go super wide

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I guess it's just a revolutionary idea for those that didn't grow up in a time when we already did this. This is pretty much what all my recipes (inherited from my grandmother) look like today, just without the bracketing.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Its not as universal as you are suggesting here. I've seen it before but there are certainly no cards like this in the boxes I've inherited.