this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
367 points (99.7% liked)

politics

30615 readers
1482 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Granted, it is a few dozen bungled policies ago, but remember when we were blowing up fishing boats in the Caribbean as part of the administration’s Operation Dude Bro antidrug strategy? Well, the results are in, and they are sadly predictable. From The Washington Post:

In a recent assessment reviewed by The Washington Post, DEA analysts found the strikes had failed to affect the supply or price of cocaine in the United States and had led traffickers to diversify beyond go-fast boats and to avoid international waters, opting instead for larger boats and hemming close to coastlines, where U.S. forces are less likely to open fire. In a closed-door briefing last month, Pentagon officials told lawmakers the strikes in international waters off South and Central America had not reduced its purity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

"We" did not do anything. The US federal government's actions are so far removed from the will of the people that we might as well considered separate entities at this point.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't fool yourself, nearly half of the US population was either cheering it on, or simply did not care.

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The boat strikes? That doesn't sound probable to me, and since there was no vote taken on it I don't see where that data comes from. Only the morons occupying the government right now think that what they are doing is just.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

They are your representatives. You may not like how your representatives are representing you on the international stage but they're still your representatives. None of us care that someone is "one of the good Americans." It's your country's leaders that are taking a shit on everyone else and Americans are the only people who can do anything about it. From the outside it seem like although very few Americans like what's going on, even fewer are willing to do anything about it and expect the rest of the world to do it for them.

Well guess what, Americans did this to America. We're not coming to save you, we can't. We'll be annihilated by the United States if we even suggest we'll try. You're on your own, figure it out.

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You are right that they are the representatives of the whole country. Which is pretty fucked up. I just want to point out that most citizens (definitely over half) see the murder of civilians as a war crime, and not something that the executive branch should have the ability to do.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

We'll be annihilated if we try to do anything about it too. The only "opposition" our overlords allow is to vote.

I think that’s how US leadership’s felt for a long time. You’re very separate.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Like it or not if you pay taxes is on you too.

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How does one get out of paying taxes on a W2? Just claim tons of exemptions?

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In the US, for most "employee" type positions (as opposed to an independent contractor) you receive a form (form W2) that shows your total pay for the year and your total deductions. When you are hired you fill out another form (W4) to tell your employer how many income tax exemptions you claim. (More exemptions = more tax breaks). In every W2 job I have worked, my taxes were taken out automatically before I got my check. So your employer kind of "pays your income taxes for you" prior to every check. As far as I know the only way to stop them from doing this is to fraudulently claim more exemptions, which the IRS will absolutely catch onto.

There are other taxes (sales tax, property tax, etc.) which you can absolutely refuse to pay, if you're okay with the IRS coming after you.

(Apologies if my explanation is slightly incorrect, I'm sure there's someone out there who can explain it better)

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yea it's illegal to not pay taxes. If the US bombed a school in france and murdered 150 white kids, not paying taxes to the government and go to jail as a result would sound as being part of the resistance.

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do back to my original question of how does one avoid paying income tax when working a W2 position? Or, now that I think about it, avoid paying sales tax? Places won't sell to you tax-free unless you have a legitimate exception.

Property tax is easy enough, just don't pay it.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do back to my original question of how does one avoid paying income tax when working a W2 position?

you work "illegally" without paying taxes

[–] burgermeister@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would love to do that, and thus receive the full value of my labor.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

more than that personally i would like to see a government that use public money to only help people rather than murder them