this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
114 points (97.5% liked)
Linux
14449 readers
682 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Out of curiosity which VPN do you recommend? I have Bazzite and it seemed like Proton was the best choice.
Proton is fine.
The CEO has said some troubling things, but the products themselves are fine for now. It is one thing to be cautious, but it is a problem when you use the ramblings and comments of an executive as an excuse to ignore how the company actually operates.
If it were like the MyPillow guy I could understand, but we are not there.
for Nazis
not op but you should just self host. VPSs are cheap - entry tariffs are like 3-5$/month for most providers, and thats more than enough to set up a Wireguard or anything else, traffic limits are rarely an issue. if your hosting goes to shit, it's easy enough to recreate the config elsewhere
You are again tied up to the VPS provider in the same way you are tied up to you ISP so there's not going to be too much privacy there. A VPN like that is useful for using it for other purposes such as playing LAN games, placing your other hosted services behind it as an additional security measure or getting access to multiple servers that don't have public access (such as your home lab behind a NAT). But it doesn't annonymize you the way VPN providers "claim" they annonymize you.
@aketawi whats with "selfhost" on vps? Still, you need to trust your vps provider... Also you need to manage it. I though selfhost is a term for selhosting files for example from your home server.
not necessarily, you could Host anything by yourSelf on a rented VPS and it will still be "more selfhosted" than buying a commercial VPN. if you're buying just to use it as a proxy, trust is also a nonissue since your traffic will be encrypted anyhow and you store no sensitive data. just don't use a plain http proxy lol
I support mullvad. Please note I don't think they necessarily provide the best service but I feel like they're the most ethical. From their pricing model where you pay the same month to month or if you buy 10 years at a time to them not requiring an account.
That said somehow my speeds on mullvad are double what I could ever get on proton (this confuses me and makes me a bit nervous but if true is cool) and I have yet to have a streaming service block me from being on a VPN (again to clarify I've only used mullvad for a couple months)
Mullvad
If you don't like Proton because the CEO said something shitty, i have bad news about Mullvad
I can understand that. However, ability to pay cash is wonderful. And I may not agree with ehat either people of either company says. But I will say that Mullvad VPN is superior to Proton.
Ivpn is also identity-less, accepts cash, has the same no logging, ram only infrastructure as mullvad, and isn't run by facists.
Thank you for the pointer. Gonna check this out.
The nice thing about proton is that they offer a suite of tools comparable to Google, but all privacy respecting (email, docs, drive, etc). So they're an easy recommendation for people dependent on those services. I almost never use their VPN, but it is neat that I have the option of a paid VPN along with the rest.
Also I only just noticed the other day that proton offers multi-hop VPNs now, so that your entrance and exit nodes are under different jurisdictions, is that just the standard for VPN services these days? I thought that was a pretty neat feature.
I am not a lover or hater of proton. I just know that for my needs and desires mullvad checks all boxes. Their VPN infrastructure is diskless (source: https://mullvad.net/en/blog/we-have-successfully-completed-our-migration-to-ram-only-vpn-infrastructure) and the ability to pay with cash. And the fact your account is just a number and no need for entering in other identifiable info. Add in 5he fact I can get OpenVPN config files or Wireguard config files directly exported so I dont have a need for another piece of software I dont need.
Where as protons VPN client if I am not mistaken is locked behind their proprietary software for connection.
I absolutely see the value in other things they offer, as I was investigating paying for email through them. But I just haven't done it.
Vpns aren't a silver bullet. They have their use case. I just know i have to have trust in the company in using their service. ~~And with the cooperation with law enforcement proton has stated to do; I am not going to use that offering. ~~ And not sure if that is standard for VPNs these days though I like that idea.
For the other service offerings they have, I self host what I need.
--Edit: struck through something I believed but could not find the source on it I was sure I had read. By no means do I want to spread misinformation. Apologies.
Yeah, I do wish proton was more open about their tech. I do know that proton allows you to make free accounts without giving them identifiable info (which makes them a popular choice for scammers, which is annoying when services just block their email domain thinking it's always nefarious). I don't recall what the payment options are, but I'd be surprised if they didn't have any crypto/anonymous ways to pay.
I still haven't made use of the proton VPN, mostly because, yeah, I don't care for running a proprietary client for something like that, but also the last time I looked into it they did offer wireguard configs that would do the same thing. The client is just intended to be a familiar cross platform interface. No idea about this Stealth mode protocol, though. Seems like that would have to be run locally.
If you do pay for their email, I recommend bringing your own domain. 99% of the time the
proton.medomain works fine, but for the 1% of the time when a system has a problem, it does make me wonder if there's somewhere in their system blacklisting their domain.I'm curious what statements you're referring to. For a company to continue operating, they have to comply with local law enforcement to the extent the law requires. They don't have a choice. If you asked mullvad, they would say the same. But the point of all these services is that they (claim to) do their best to not keep any records by design, so that when law enforcement comes with a subpoena, they have as little as possible to hand over in cooperation. But yeah, as you said, at the end of the day we just have to trust that that's how they operate.
I also wish they were open with their tech. That is true; and would be hard to protect against it without outright blocking proton as a whole for sign-ups.
I aim to go as open as I can with everything. I know it's not feasible to go 100% with some niche needs I have. So I just aim to use as much open tech as possible because it aligns with what I believe.
Absolutely was going to bring my own domain if I go down the proton route.
I will retract my statement on law enforcement; I couldn't find any of the sources I thought I had on there being words about law enforcement cooperation. I will absolutely not push a false narrative; so thank you for pointing that out. If I do find what I thought I remembered seeing info on, I will update my comment/replies.
Ultimately it doesn't matter how well a software can protect your information/data, etc; if the company/entity using it doesn't value what privacy/safety/security.
And ultimately, I am not a a defacto source on what others should do. That should be up to the individual based on their goals.
Not trying to convince you to jump ship, your reasons for using mullvad seem sound, but I wanted to mention you can also export OpenVPN Configs from proton too. You're not locked to the app.
Good they offer that. I dont believe on brand loyalty. So keeping options open in accordance to my beliefs is the way I go typically.