this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
36 points (90.9% liked)
Feminism
1559 readers
14 users here now
Welcome to the feminism community on Lemmy.World!
Rules:
- This is a feminist community, meant for discussing issues around equality and gender. Disagreement is acceptable but anti-feminist statements are not. Similarly, TERF-aligned comments, including anti-trans or other anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments are not allowed. This does not preclude debunking anti-feminist talking points.
- Posts must be related to feminism, gender issues, or related content. Topics can include current issues/news, historical topics, personal questions/thoughts, or discussion threads. If you are unsure if your post is on-topic, feel free to message the mods before posting.
- Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.
- Follow site-wide rules.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think you read your own article. Unless you're referring to the workforce segmentation part? Even though the article does not identify that as a primary issue and it's unrelated to the outputs of genAI.
I read everything I post. I was referring to your comment in relation to the thesis of the article, which is why I quoted a term you used.
The thesis at of the article is the same stance as Meta. Blaming AI for problems caused by the past, while also acknowledging the past, but continuing to blame AI.
It is like dangling a low hanging fruit in front of feminism in an effort to distract its energy from what it usually represents. It is undermining and insulting. Women are not that dumb.