this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
36 points (90.9% liked)
Feminism
1567 readers
38 users here now
Welcome to the feminism community on Lemmy.World!
Rules:
- This is a feminist community, meant for discussing issues around equality and gender. Disagreement is acceptable but anti-feminist statements are not. Similarly, TERF-aligned comments, including anti-trans or other anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments are not allowed. This does not preclude debunking anti-feminist talking points.
- Posts must be related to feminism, gender issues, or related content. Topics can include current issues/news, historical topics, personal questions/thoughts, or discussion threads. If you are unsure if your post is on-topic, feel free to message the mods before posting.
- Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.
- Follow site-wide rules.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The thesis at of the article is the same stance as Meta. Blaming AI for problems caused by the past, while also acknowledging the past, but continuing to blame AI.
It is like dangling a low hanging fruit in front of feminism in an effort to distract its energy from what it usually represents. It is undermining and insulting. Women are not that dumb.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say at this point.
In what way does the article blame AI for the problems of the past? What is it trying to distract from? and how does it undermine women? Which Meta stance is it reiterating?