this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
213 points (91.1% liked)

Not The Onion

22414 readers
2152 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're choosing to do or not do something with someone because of their sex/gender it's sexist. Simple as that. I don't care if those beliefs are due to religion or not.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

That must be quite the surprise to people who only enter romantic relationships with the sex they're attracted to.

More seriously, sexism is specifically prejudice based on sex, and it's bad for obvious reasons (the fact that it causes harm to the sex suffering from such prejudice). If you want to expand the definition to include "choosing to do or not do something with someone because of their sex/gender" (we'll call this sexism+) you'll have to argue that sexism+ is rooted in regular sexism. This isn't something you can just assume (well you can, but what can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence).