politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Need to send out more photos like a kidnapping victim from the 1980s holding today’s newspaper. Should use a Polaroid this time to make it really authentic. Maybe a note with some letters cut out from a skateboarding magazine. Someone can wait at a payphone at the mall next to Spencer’s for an anonymous landline call with further instructions.
Man I really miss Orange Julius.
Honestly it's the fact that the paper was there that sells me for it. Like whoever took or doctored or made that photo was like "no we have to include the paper, nobody is going to believe us if we don't" but if they really wanted us to believe them they'd make a statement. Which means that it wasn't a good faith photo, they deliberately did their best to trick us by making it "as believable as we can"
That’s why it’s so funny. It’s like a parody of what these out of touch assholes think a proof of life photo would be, in 2026. When everyone has a video recording device in their hand at all times. It’s comically not credible (even if real.)
Exactly. They know what they're doing. Nobody thinks he's some "spring chicken". He's old as dirt and he freezes in public all the time. If he didn't look nearly dead then they'd do a 30 second video of him saying "hello everyone I'm getting better" but they aren't. If he was really sitting in that chair with the paper and coherent then they'd let him be coherent.
I like how everyone stopped to argue whether or not it was todays paper, but no one stopped to ask, why the fuck would they do that?
It really was a tasty treat.